ArticleCureus2024
A Retrospective Review of Endogenous Endophthalmitis: Three Years of Experience at Sultan Ahmad Shah Medical Centre at International Islamic University Malaysia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging Ocular Pathogen Resistance and Clinically Used Solutions: A Problem That Is More than Meets the Eye.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Clinical retrospective analysis of 218 cases of infectious endophthalmitis.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Endogenous endophthalmitis is characterized by severe intraocular inflammation caused by the invasion of microorganisms into the anterior and posterior chambers of the eye. It results from hematogenous spread from distant foci of infection. This, in turn, leads to potential vision loss and blindness due to reduced anatomical and functional outcomes. The latest reported prevalence of endogenous endophthalmitis accounts for at least 2-8% of cases of general endophthalmitis which is fairly significant. Purpose This study aimed to analyze the clinical profile of endogenous endophthalmitis presented in the Ophthalmology Clinic, Sultan Ahmad Shah Medical Centre at International Islamic University Malaysia (SASMEC@IIUM). This study includes the patients' demographics, clinical manifestations, causative organism, treatment, and final visual outcome. Methods This is a retrospective case series of endogenous endophthalmitis patients from January 2020 to June 2023. The data were obtained from the patients' medical records in SASMEC@IIUM. Results A total of six patients (six eyes) were diagnosed with endogenous endophthalmitis from January 2020 to June 2023. Four patients (66.6%) were female, with a mean age of 51.6 ± 17.5 years. Presenting visual acuity ranged between 6/21 to hand movement (HM). Five patients (83.3%) presented with reduced vision, while one presented with eye redness (16.6%). Ocular signs included vitritis and retinitis (five eyes, 83.3%), hypopyon (five eyes, 83.3%), injected conjunctiva (five eyes, 83.3%), and eyelid swelling (one eye, 16.6%). The most common primary infection seen was intraabdominal sepsis (three patients, 50%), septic arthritis, hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), and urinary tract infection (UTI). Vitreous biopsy was only positive in two patients (33.3%) However, five out of the six patients (83.3%) had positive blood cultures (two
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.