ArticleCureus2024
Assessment of Vacuum-Assisted Closure (VAC) Therapy in Orthopaedic Infections.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- PelnacJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Chronic and infected orthopaedic wounds may result in profound morbidity, amputation, sepsis and even death. It may need prolonged hospitalization and multiple surgical procedures for treatment. Vacuum-assisted dressing (VAD) is a comparatively newer modality for treating chronic non-healing wounds which helps in faster wound healing, decreases the frequency of dressing and reduces hospitalization time. The aim of our study is to evaluate the outcome of vacuum-assisted dressing (VAD) in the management of orthopaedic wounds. Materials and methods A case series including 20 patients with post-traumatic open fracture wounds, post-operative infected wounds and wounds with underlying chronic osteomyelitis were treated with VAD. Wound size was measured pre- and post-debridement and every five days, at the time of dressing change until the wound healed or grafted. The duration of wound healing or wound closure was measured and documented. Results Wound size decreased significantly and healthy granulation tissues were observed in all wounds after the application of vacuum-assisted dressing. Wound size decreased by an average of 22% after debridement and first vacuum-assisted dressing removal. Infection control was achieved in 18 out of 20 patients (90%) who had wounds closed either by secondary closure or by skin grafting. Conclusion We conclude that VAD is an efficient technique in the management of orthopaedic wounds, especially in the management of open fracture wounds but less effective in chronically infected wounds with underlying osteomyelitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.