Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39070333›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Efficacy of Keratin AE1/AE3 Staining in Evaluating Resection Margins of a Urachal Remnant and Improving Surgical Precision and Outcomes: A Case Report.

Kyoko Baba, Ami Kuwabara

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kyoko BabaDepartment of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, JPN.
Ami KuwabaraDepartment of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A urachal remnant is a rare condition characterized by the persistence of the urachus beyond birth, often presenting with symptoms such as umbilical effusion, periomphalitis, and abdominal pain. Surgical resection is the cornerstone of treatment, but ensuring complete removal of urachal epithelium at the resection margin remains a challenge. This case report focuses on evaluating resection margins of urachal remnants and reports the case of a 25-year-old woman with complaints of umbilical effusion and a mass. She was diagnosed with a urachal remnant and underwent urachal resection and reconstruction, with postoperative confirmation of favorable outcomes and the absence of microscopic hematuria. The intraoperative examination did not reveal any macroscopically clear luminal structure of the urachal resection margin. Subsequent histopathological analysis of the margin using hematoxylin and eosin staining was challenging, prompting the use of immunohistological staining with keratin AE1/AE3 antibody. The antibody did not stain the urachal resection margin, confirming the complete removal of urachal epithelial components. Our study findings suggest the utility of keratin AE1/AE3 staining for assessing urachal remnant margins and underscore the importance of thorough evaluation and complete resection of urachal remnant to prevent recurrence and mitigate the risk of urachal cancer, contributing to improved surgical outcomes and patient care.

Indexed as

immunohistological stainingkeratin ae1/aemargin evaluationsurgical resectionurachal epitheliumurachal remnant

Identifiers

PMID39070333
PMCPMC11281833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.