Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39070320›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Urethral Mobilisation and Glanuloplasty Technique for Primary and Second-Stage Repair of Hypospadias: A Single Hospital Experience.

Saeed Alhindi, Sanad Elrishe, Zahra Khalaf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saeed AlhindiPediatric Surgery, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama, BHR.
Sanad ElrisheDepartment of Surgery, Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital, Blackburn, GBR.
Zahra KhalafDepartment of Surgery, Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital, Blackburn, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Over the years, the technique used to correct hypospadias has undergone several modifications to improve outcomes and reduce complication rates. In this study, a modification has been made to the second stage of the two-stage repair of proximal hypospadias. This modification utilises urethral mobilisation and glanuloplasty, traditionally used to repair distal hypospadias, in the second stage of repair of proximal hypospadias. This study aims to assess the implications of this modification on the outcomes in addition to adding to the pre-existing literature on the outcomes of urethral mobilisation and glanuloplasty in the repair of distal hypospadias. Methodology A prospective study was conducted at Salmaniya Medical Complex in Bahrain between January 2016 and December 2021. All patients with either proximal or distal hypospadias who underwent a surgical repair using the urethral mobilisation and glanuloplasty technique were included. The following cases were excluded: patients with proximal hypospadias who did not undergo a first-stage repair, those with a hypoplastic urethra, and those aged 14 years or more. Results The mean operative time for the proximal hypospadias group was 78 minutes, while it was 62 minutes in the distal hypospadias group. Furthermore, the catheter remained in situ for a mean of three days postoperatively in the proximal hypospadias group. Overall, four of 35 patients (11.4%) experienced complications in the proximal hypospadias group. Of these, there were two (5.7%) cases of meatal stenosis, two (5.7%) cases of wound dehiscence, and no cases of diverticula or urethrocutaneous fistulas. Meanwhile, in the distal hypospadias group, one of 117 patients (0.9%) experienced a complication; the complication was meatal stenosis. there was a significant correlation between the age of patients and the complication rate (p = 0.06). The operative time was also found to be a significant factor influencing the occurrence of complications. The follow-up duration ranged between five months and 12 months. All patients had good cosmetic outcomes. Conclusions This study found that urethral mobilisation and glanuloplasty for the second-stage repair of proximal hypospadias resulted in lower complications than the traditional two-stage operation and a short duration of urinary catheterisation. There is a need to conduct studies with longer follow-up durations and objective measures of function to provide a better comparison between the different techniques used.

Indexed as

congenitalglanuloplastyhypospadias repairproximal hypospadiasurethral mobilisation

Identifiers

PMID39070320
PMCPMC11274756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.