ArticleCureus2024
Evaluating Sleep Challenges in Hospitalized Youth.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo characterize sleep quality and sleep disruptions among youth hospitalized outside of the intensive care unit (ICU). PATIENTS AND
methodsParticipants were eligible for the survey-based study if they were 8-17 years old, English-speaking, hospitalized for ≥3 days outside of the ICU, and developmentally able to understand surveys. Survey administration included a sleep diary, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale for Children and Adolescents (ESS-CHAD), and a study-specific Inpatient Sleep Disruptors Questionnaire. The chart review provided additional clinical information. Descriptive and comparative statistics were performed to assess the association between overnight clinical monitoring and daytime sleepiness.
resultsForty-five participants (mean age 13.4 years, 60% female), recruited between May and December 2022, were included in the study. Mean total sleep time (8.2 ± 1.7 hours) and ESS-CHAD score (8.6 ± 4.3) were normal with 79% reporting fair to good sleep the previous night. Participants rated alarms on equipment, vital signs, and noise as most disruptive to sleep. Participants with vital signs every four hours showed higher levels of daytime sleepiness compared with participants with vitals measured every shift (9.3 vs. 6.3; p=0.04).
conclusionsMost participants reported normal sleep, although there was wide variability with a portion with impaired sleep quality and elevated daytime sleepiness. Alarms on equipment, vital signs, and noise were most disruptive, and increased vital sign frequency was also associated with increased daytime sleepiness. In clinically stable pediatric patients, a reduction in vital sign monitoring overnight may be an important change to improve patient sleep.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.