ArticleGlobal advances in integrative medicine and health
A Pharmacy-Based Observational Study of Digest-8 Dietary Supplement in a Consumer Healthcare Context.
Article in Global advances in integrative medicine and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs), a frequent cause of gastrointestinal (GI) symptomology, impact 40%-69% of the United States population. People who suffer from FGIDs often self-manage their symptoms using consumer healthcare products such as dietary supplements. Objective: To investigate use of Digest-8 dietary supplement by people who purchased the product from pharmacies for their FGID symptoms. Methods: This pharmacy-based observational study included a convenience sample recruited by flyers at 2 pharmacies upon purchase of Digest-8 dietary supplement to assess symptoms, satisfaction, tolerability, and side-effects through 7 weekly voluntary surveys completed by consenting participants. Results: Twenty-two participants completed an initial survey and a collective total of 59 follow-up surveys. Analysis of follow-up surveys compared to baseline provided pilot data on symptom improvement, satisfaction, tolerability, and low side effect profile. Conclusion: Preliminary findings of the study warrant a follow-up prospective randomized clinical trial to address the study limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.