ArticleJFMS open reports
Megaesophagus in an 8-month-old cat secondary to a laryngomucocele.
Article in JFMS open reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Case summary: An 8-month-old spayed female cat presented with a 7-week history of progressive dyspnoea, dysphagia and regurgitation. Plain radiography revealed megaoesophagus with a large, rounded, soft tissue opacity laryngeal mass. Endoscopic examination revealed a fluid-filled lesion, which was lanced and drained completely. As a result of recurrence of the mass and infection 2 days later, the mass was surgically excised. The mass was diagnosed as a laryngomucocele based on clinical and histopathological findings. Clinical signs resolved immediately after removal of the mass, the megaoesophagus resolved a couple of days postoperatively and no relapse was noted over the following 3 years. Relevance and novel information: To the author's knowledge, this is the first case of laryngomucocele described in a cat. This cause should be included in the differential diagnosis of respiratory obstruction and acquired megaoesophagus in cats. This report demonstrates that megaoesophagus resulting from a respiratory obstruction resolves spontaneously after removal of the obstruction; therefore, respiratory tract assessment should be recommended in cats with signs of megaoesophagus because the prognosis could be good compared with other causes of megaoesophagus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.