ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
Kinetic models towards an enhanced understanding of diverse ADC conjugation reactions.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kinetic Modeling of the Antibody Disulfide Bond Reduction Reaction With Integrated Prediction of the Drug Load Profile for Cysteine-Conjugated ADCs.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The conjugation reaction is the central step in the manufacturing process of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). This reaction generates a heterogeneous and complex mixture of differently conjugated sub-species depending on the chosen conjugation chemistry. The parametrization of the conjugation reaction through mechanistic kinetic models offers a chance to enhance valuable reaction knowledge and ensure process robustness. This study introduces a versatile modeling framework for the conjugation reaction of cysteine-conjugated ADC modalities-site-specific and interchain disulfide conjugation. Various conjugation kinetics involving different maleimide-functionalized payloads were performed, while controlled gradual payload feeding was employed to decelerate the conjugation, facilitating a more detailed investigation of the reaction mechanism. The kinetic data were analyzed with a reducing reversed phase (RP) chromatography method, that can readily be implemented for the accurate characterization of ADCs with diverse drug-to-antibody ratios, providing the conjugation trajectories of the single chains of the monoclonal antibody (mAb). Possible kinetic models for the conjugation mechanism were then developed and selected based on multiple criteria. When calibrating the established model to kinetics involving different payloads, conjugation rates were determined to be payload-specific. Further conclusions regarding the kinetic comparability across the two modalities could also be derived. One calibrated model was used for an exemplary
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.