Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39070071›Full record

ArticleComputing in cardiology2022

Cell Unexcitability and Electrotonic Coupling Phenomenon Analysis of Ablation-Created Lesions: A Study Case with Ablated Explanted Human Heart.

J Siles, J Salinet, C J Crowley, F Fenton, N Bhatia, S Iravanian, I Uzelac

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computing in cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J SilesHEartLab, Federal University of ABC, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil.
J SalinetHEartLab, Federal University of ABC, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil.
C J CrowleyGeorgia Institute of Technology, Georgia, USA.
F FentonGeorgia Institute of Technology, Georgia, USA.
N BhatiaEmory University Hospital, Georgia, USA.
S IravanianGeorgia Institute of Technology, Georgia, USA.
I UzelacGeorgia Institute of Technology, Georgia, USA.

Funding

Integrative High-Resolution Experimental and Multiscale Modeling of Arrhythmias to Optimize Low Energy Anti-fibrillation Pacing (LEAP)R01HL143450 · NHLBI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Flavio H Fenton · 2018 to 2026
$3.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL143450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of radiofrequency ablation (RFA)-created lesions on an explanted human heart in wedge preparation by simultaneous endo and sub-endo optical mapping. The heart in Langendorff perfusion was ablated under 40 W. The ventricle was stained with Vm sensitive dye Di-4-ANBDQPQ and two excitation light bands of different penetration depths were used (red = 660 nm, green = 525 nm) to perform a conduction velocity (CV) difference analysis for identification of CV alter-nans. The relative change in fluorescence (ΔF/F) traces were analyzed before and after ablation. Local activation time (LAT) was determined by the 50% approach. Local CV was obtained using the circle method, and RFA created lesions were characterized by examining the CV alternans correlated with transmural heterogeneities. The presence of CV alternans results from reduced excitability in a non-homogeneous lesion consisting of excitable and non-excitable cells. The absence of CV alternans in optical mapping with green light and their presence with deep-red light illustrates incomplete ablation across the ventricular wall or non-homogeneous ablation in the mid-myocardial layer. The presence of an intramural scar impairs the efficacy of the RFA procedure, suggesting a need for alternative ablations strategies.

Identifiers

PMID39070071
PMCPMC11281460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.