Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39069686›Full record

ArticleClinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology2024

Exploration of a Machine Learning Model Using Self-rating Questionnaires for Detecting Depression in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Heeseung Park, Kyungwon Kim, Eunsoo Moon, Hyun Ju Lim, Hwagyu Suh, Kyoung-Eun Kim, Taewoo Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Digital Psychiatry with Chatbot: Recent Advances and Limitations.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Heeseung ParkBreast Cancer Clinic of Busan Cancer Center, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9889-5217
Kyungwon KimBiomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8947-9078
Eunsoo MoonBiomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8863-3413
Hyun Ju LimBiomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8962-8173
Hwagyu SuhBiomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0360-6708
Kyoung-Eun KimBreast Cancer Clinic of Busan Cancer Center, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6487-0935
Taewoo KangBreast Cancer Clinic of Busan Cancer Center, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6279-0904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Given the long-term and severe distress experienced during breast cancer treatment, detecting depression among breast cancer patients is clinically crucial. This study aimed to explore a machine-learning model using self-report questionnaires to screen for depression in patients with breast cancer. Methods: A total of 327 patients who visited the breast cancer clinic were included in this study. Depressive symptoms were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The depression was evaluated according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition. The prediction model's performance based on supervised machine learning was conducted using MATLAB2022. Results: The BDI showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.785 when using the logistic regression (LR) classifier. The HADS and PHQ-9 showed an AUC of 0.784 and 0.756 when using the linear discriminant analysis, respectively. The combinations of BDI and HADS showed an AUC of 0.812 when using the LR. The combinations of PHQ-9, BDI, and HADS showed an AUC of 0.807 when using LR. Conclusion: The combination model with BDI and HADS in breast cancer patients might be better than the method using a single scale. In future studies, it is necessary to explore strategies that can improve the performance of the model by integrating the method using questionnaires and other methods.

Indexed as

Breast neoplasmsDepressionMachine learningSelf report

Identifiers

PMID39069686
PMCPMC11289607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.