Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39069611›Full record

Observational studyJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2024

Surgical intervention for lung cancer in patients aged 75 and above: potential associations with increased mortality rates-a single-center observational study.

Andrey Kaprin, Oleg Pikin, Andrey Ryabov, Oleg Aleksandrov, Denis Larionov, Airat Garifullin

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Is SBRT the optimal first-line treatment for operable early-stage NSCLC in elderly patients?Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  8. Current status and influencing factors of spiritual care needs of patients with lung cancer in chemotherapy: a longitudinal observational study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrey KaprinFederal State Budget Institution National Medical Research Radiology Centre of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (FSBI NMRRC), Moscow, Russia.
Oleg PikinP. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, 3, 2 Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow, 125284, Russia.
Andrey RyabovP. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, 3, 2 Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow, 125284, Russia.
Oleg AleksandrovP. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, 3, 2 Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow, 125284, Russia. alexandrov.oleg.al@gmail.com.
Denis LarionovP. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, 3, 2 Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow, 125284, Russia.
Airat GarifullinP. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, 3, 2 Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow, 125284, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung cancer, which is diagnosed two to three times more frequently in patients over the age of 70, is a leading cause of cancer-specific mortality. Given the elevated risk of morbidity and mortality, surgical intervention may not always be the most appropriate primary treatment option. This study aims to evaluate specific risk factors associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality in elderly patients and to optimize patient selection therefore improving surgical outcomes. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe study encompassed a cohort of 73 patients aged 75 and above who underwent surgical treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the P. Hertsen Moscow Oncological Research Institute between 2015 and 2021. All patients underwent preoperative evaluation, including PET/CT staging and functional assessment, carried out by a multidisciplinary team comprising thoracic surgeons, anesthesiologists, and other medical specialists.

resultsThe investigation revealed a postoperative mortality rate of 5.5% and a postoperative morbidity incidence of 16.4%, with occurrences of atrial fibrillation in 41.6%, persistent air leak in 33.3%, and pneumonia in 25% of complicated cases. At the one-year follow-up, 88% of patients remained free from relapse, whereas at three years, this rate stood at 66%. During the follow-up period, 16 patients (22%) passed away, with a median survival duration of 44 months. Survival rates at one year, three years, and five years were 71%, 66%, and 35%, respectively. Multivariate analysis disclosed several significant factors predicting a complex postoperative period, including stage IIIb (p = 0.023), pN1 (p = 0.049), pN2 (p = 0.030), and central location (p = 0.007). Additionally, overall survival was primarily influenced by a Charlson comorbidity index of 6 (p = 0.044), stage Ia2 (p = 0.033), and the necessity for thoracotomy (p = 0.045).

conclusionEach case of lung cancer in patients aged 75 and older necessitates an individualized approach. Given the higher mortality rate relative to younger patients, comprehensive risk assessment and preoperative management of underlying comorbidities are imperative, with the involvement of anesthesiologists, intensive care physicians, cardiologists, and other relevant specialists as needed.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm StagingPneumonectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvival RateComplicationsElderlyPerioperative periodPulmonary surgical procedure

Identifiers

PMID39069611
PMCPMC11285345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.