Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39069474›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2025

Utility of Echo-planar Imaging with Compressed Sensitivity Encoding (EPICS) in the Evaluation of Small Breast Cancers Using Diffusion-weighted Imaging with Background Suppression (DWIBS).

Toshiki Kazama, Yui Nagafuji, Naoki Niikura, Takuho Okamura, Marc Van Cauteren, Makoto Obara, Susumu Takano, Natsuo Konta, Tomohiko Horie, Taro Takahara and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Toshiki KazamaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yui NagafujiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Naoki NiikuraDepartment of Breast Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takuho OkamuraDepartment of Breast Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Marc Van CauterenPhilips Healthcare, BIU MR, Tokyo, Japan.
Makoto ObaraPhilips Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
Susumu TakanoDepartment of Radiology, Tokai University Hospital, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Natsuo KontaDepartment of Radiology, Tokai University Hospital, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tomohiko HorieDepartment of Radiology, Tokai University Hospital, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Taro TakaharaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tokai University School of Engineering, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa, Japan.
Nobue KumakiDepartment of Pathology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tetsu NiwaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Jun HashimotoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHigh b-value acquisition and diffusion-weighted imaging with background suppression (DWIBS) are desirable in high-specificity breast cancer diagnosis on non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; however, this inherently results in a lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Compressed sensitivity encoding (C-SENSE), which combines SENSE with compressed sensing, improves the SNR by reducing noise. Recent technological improvements allow us to incorporate this acceleration technique into echo-planar imaging, called echo-planar imaging with C-SENSE (EPICS). This study aimed to compare image quality and reliability of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) between DWIBS obtained using SENSE and EPICS in patients with small breast cancers.

methodsThirty-seven patients with pathologically confirmed breast cancer underwent DWIBS, and images were reconstructed using both conventional SENSE (SENSE-DWIBS) and EPICS (EPICS-DWIBS). Two board-certified radiologists independently evaluated lesion conspicuity (LC) and noise using a 5-point grading scale. The same 2 radiologists independently measured SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and the mean cancer ADC. The Pearson coefficient and Bland-Altman plot were applied to assess the accuracy of ADCs.

resultsLC scores were higher with EPICS than with SENSE, reaching significance for one reviewer but not the other reviewer. Noise ratings on visual evaluation were significantly lower with EPICS than with SENSE (P < 0.001 for both reviewers). SNR was significantly higher with EPICS than with SENSE (P < 0.005 for both reviewers). CNR was significantly higher with EPICS than with SENSE (P < 0.001 for both reviewers). Bland-Altman plots of cancer ADCs using EPICS-DWIBS and SENSE-DWIBS showed excellent concordance, with a bias of 0.026 × 10

conclusionEPICS enhances breast DWIBS image quality, with improved SNR and CNR and reduced noise levels. The ADCs of breast cancers obtained using EPICS were almost perfectly correlated with those obtained using conventional SENSE.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsData CompressionDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEcho-Planar ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreastFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificitybreast cancercompressed SENSEdiffusion-weighted imagemagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID39069474
PMCPMC12557875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.