Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39069314›Full record

ArticleCentral European journal of public health2024

Return to work after ischaemic stroke in young adults: a scoping review.

Daniela Bartoníčková, Elena Gurková, Renáta Zeleníková, Soňa Kalafutová

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Central European journal of public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniela BartoníčkováDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Elena GurkováDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Renáta ZeleníkováDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Soňa KalafutováDepartment of Technical Disciplines in Health Care, Faculty of Health Care, University of Presov, Presov, Slovak Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of the study was to synthesize the body of knowledge on the factors that are important to the process of returning to work after ischaemic stroke in young adults under 55 years of age.

methodsGuidelines regarding the scoping review methodology developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute, and the PRISMA checklist for scoping reviews were used. A total of 2,249 studies were identified through a bibliographic search in six databases.

resultsA total of ten studies were finally selected to respond to the research questions. Eight studies were quantitative observational studies, and two studies had a case study design. The rate of returning to work varied between the studies. The frequency of returning to work in young stroke patients, independent of the time of assessment, ranged from 42.4% to 86%. Returning to work after ischaemic stroke in young adults is a complex process and multidimensional problem which is affected by clinical variables (level of neurological deficits, cognitive ability, independency in activities of daily living, fatigue and depression, cardiovascular factors), as well as the socioeconomic and occupational status.

conclusionThere is insufficient evidence concerning interventions promoting return to work. Future studies should focus on examining effective interventions to help young stroke survivors return to work.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokeReturn to WorkAdultHumansMiddle AgedYoung Adultischaemic strokereturn to workscoping reviewyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID39069314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.