ArticleAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2024
Deep learning-based surgical phase recognition in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Article in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated surgical phase recognition in pediatric laparoscopic fundoplication using deep learning: a retrospective video-based study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Minimally Invasive and Robotic Gastrointestinal Surgery: Major Applications and Recent Advances.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Remote detection of the critical view of safety in pediatric laparoscopic cholecystectomy using artifitial intelligence.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Tools Across the Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgical Pathway: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Reassessment of deep learning-based surgical phase recognition in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2025Article
- Comment on: "Deep learning-based surgical phase recognition in laparoscopic cholecystectomy".Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence based surgical support for experimental laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims: Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been used to assess surgery quality, educate, and evaluate surgical performance using video recordings in the minimally invasive surgery era. Much attention has been paid to automating surgical workflow analysis from surgical videos for an effective evaluation to achieve the assessment and evaluation. This study aimed to design a deep learning model to automatically identify surgical phases using laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos and automatically assess the accuracy of recognizing surgical phases. Methods: One hundred and twenty cholecystectomy videos from a public dataset (Cholec80) and 40 laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos recorded between July 2022 and December 2022 at a single institution were collected. These datasets were split into training and testing datasets for the AI model at a 2:1 ratio. Test scenarios were constructed according to structural characteristics of the trained model. No pre- or post-processing of input data or inference output was performed to accurately analyze the effect of the label on model training. Results: A total of 98,234 frames were extracted from 40 cases as test data. The overall accuracy of the model was 91.2%. The most accurate phase was Calot's triangle dissection (F1 score: 0.9421), whereas the least accurate phase was clipping and cutting (F1 score: 0.7761). Conclusions: Our AI model identified phases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a high accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.