Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39069309›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2024

Deep learning-based surgical phase recognition in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Hye Yeon Yang, Seung Soo Hong, Jihun Yoon, Bokyung Park, Youngno Yoon, Dai Hoon Han, Gi Hong Choi, Min-Kook Choi, Sung Hyun Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hye Yeon YangDepartment of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7831-2341
Seung Soo HongDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9913-8437
Jihun YoonHutom Corp., Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8629-6134
Bokyung ParkHutom Corp., Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0925-7511
Youngno YoonHutom Corp., Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9692-9181
Dai Hoon HanDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2787-7876
Gi Hong ChoiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1593-3773
Min-Kook ChoiHutom Corp., Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7610-631X
Sung Hyun KimDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7683-9687

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims: Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been used to assess surgery quality, educate, and evaluate surgical performance using video recordings in the minimally invasive surgery era. Much attention has been paid to automating surgical workflow analysis from surgical videos for an effective evaluation to achieve the assessment and evaluation. This study aimed to design a deep learning model to automatically identify surgical phases using laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos and automatically assess the accuracy of recognizing surgical phases. Methods: One hundred and twenty cholecystectomy videos from a public dataset (Cholec80) and 40 laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos recorded between July 2022 and December 2022 at a single institution were collected. These datasets were split into training and testing datasets for the AI model at a 2:1 ratio. Test scenarios were constructed according to structural characteristics of the trained model. No pre- or post-processing of input data or inference output was performed to accurately analyze the effect of the label on model training. Results: A total of 98,234 frames were extracted from 40 cases as test data. The overall accuracy of the model was 91.2%. The most accurate phase was Calot's triangle dissection (F1 score: 0.9421), whereas the least accurate phase was clipping and cutting (F1 score: 0.7761). Conclusions: Our AI model identified phases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a high accuracy.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceComputer terminalsLaparoscopic cholecystectomyPattern recognition, automatedSurgical procedures, operative

Identifiers

PMID39069309
PMCPMC11599821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.