ArticleJournal of clinical epidemiology2024
Sample size in multistakeholder Delphi surveys: at what minimum sample size do replicability of results stabilize?
Article in Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07684703 (The CANVAS), which is not on this map. Cited by 85 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The CANVAS (Consensus And Norms for Medical Visualization Academic Standards) Study: Developing Professional Standards for Effective Medical Visualization - A Modified Delphi Study
Who cites it
85 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Development of a core outcome set for studies on centralization of healthcare services.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
- The effect of exercise on improving cognitive function in people with Down's syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Exploring factors affecting the use of blended diets for children and young people in health, education and social care settings in the UK: The protocol for a realist mixed methods study.Nutrition and health · 2026Article
- Consensus definition and classification of neglected fractures and dislocations: protocol for an international modified Delphi study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Essential Information About Chronobiology and Chronotherapy for the Optimal Care of People With Bipolar Disorders: An Expert Consensus.Bipolar disorders · 2026Article
- Development of a robotic training curriculum for visceral and gastrointestinal surgical trainees: an international Delphi study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Spiritual Care: Modified Delphi Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Identification of Potentially Inappropriate Medications for Adults Below 65 Years: Protocol for a Modified Delphi Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Tailoring the CFIR to Medication Adherence Interventions: A Delphi and Living Lab Study.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Developing a core outcome set for intervention studies in post stroke cognitive impairment (COS-PSCI): a protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Development of a robotic training curriculum for visceral and gastrointestinal surgical trainees: an international Delphi study.The British journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Defining the need for analgesia in the emergency department: an international consensus statement.European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a Robotic Training Curriculum for Visceral and Gastrointestinal Surgical Trainees: An International Delphi Study.United European gastroenterology journal · 2026Article
- Implementation of physical activity interventions for children and young people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: an international modified Delphi study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Article
- Advancing sustainable medication use in healthcare: a Delphi study on (de)prescribing interventions.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Priority European strategies for sustainable access to high-quality genetic counselling in cancer: A Delphi study.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveThe minimum sample size for multistakeholder Delphi surveys remains understudied. Drawing from three large international multistakeholder Delphi surveys, this study aimed to: 1) investigate the effect of increasing sample size on replicability of results; 2) assess whether the level of replicability of results differed with participant characteristics: for example, gender, age, and profession.
methodsWe used data from Delphi surveys to develop guidance for improved reporting of health-care intervention trials: SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) and CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) extension for surrogate end points (n = 175, 22 items rated); CONSORT-SPI [CONSORT extension for Social and Psychological Interventions] (n = 333, 77 items rated); and core outcome set for burn care (n = 553, 88 items rated). Resampling with replacement was used to draw random subsamples from the participant data set in each of the three surveys. For each subsample, the median value of all rated survey items was calculated and compared to the medians from the full participant data set. The median number (and interquartile range) of medians replicated was used to calculate the percentage replicability (and variability). High replicability was defined as ≥80% and moderate as 60% and <80%
resultsThe average median replicability (variability) as a percentage of total number of items rated from the three datasets was 81% (10%) at a sample size of 60. In one of the datasets (CONSORT-SPI), a ≥80% replicability was reached at a sample size of 80. On average, increasing the sample size from 80 to 160 increased the replicability of results by a further 3% and reduced variability by 1%. For subgroup analysis based on participant characteristics (eg, gender, age, professional role), using resampled samples of 20 to 100 showed that a sample size of 20 to 30 resulted to moderate replicability levels of 64% to 77%.
conclusionWe found that a minimum sample size of 60-80 participants in multistakeholder Delphi surveys provides a high level of replicability (≥80%) in the results. For Delphi studies limited to individual stakeholder groups (such as researchers, clinicians, patients), a sample size of 20 to 30 per group may be sufficient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.