Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39069013›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical epidemiology2024

Sample size in multistakeholder Delphi surveys: at what minimum sample size do replicability of results stabilize?

Anthony Muchai Manyara, Anthony Purvis, Oriana Ciani, Gary S Collins, Rod S Taylor

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07684703 (The CANVAS), which is not on this map. Cited by 85 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07684703 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The CANVAS (Consensus And Norms for Medical Visualization Academic Standards) Study: Developing Professional Standards for Effective Medical Visualization - A Modified Delphi Study

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsMedical Visualization, Medical Illustration, ConsensusArmsDelphi procedure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Artificial Intelligence in Spiritual Care: Modified Delphi Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Defining the need for analgesia in the emergency department: an international consensus statement.European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anthony Muchai ManyaraSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; Global Health and Ageing Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. Electronic address: Anthony.Manyara@bristol.ac.uk.
Anthony PurvisSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Oriana CianiCentre for Research on Health and Social Care Management, SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy.
Gary S CollinsUK EQUATOR Centre, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Rod S TaylorMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit & Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 27294Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/1Medical Research Council MR/V038400/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe minimum sample size for multistakeholder Delphi surveys remains understudied. Drawing from three large international multistakeholder Delphi surveys, this study aimed to: 1) investigate the effect of increasing sample size on replicability of results; 2) assess whether the level of replicability of results differed with participant characteristics: for example, gender, age, and profession.

methodsWe used data from Delphi surveys to develop guidance for improved reporting of health-care intervention trials: SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) and CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) extension for surrogate end points (n = 175, 22 items rated); CONSORT-SPI [CONSORT extension for Social and Psychological Interventions] (n = 333, 77 items rated); and core outcome set for burn care (n = 553, 88 items rated). Resampling with replacement was used to draw random subsamples from the participant data set in each of the three surveys. For each subsample, the median value of all rated survey items was calculated and compared to the medians from the full participant data set. The median number (and interquartile range) of medians replicated was used to calculate the percentage replicability (and variability). High replicability was defined as ≥80% and moderate as 60% and <80%

resultsThe average median replicability (variability) as a percentage of total number of items rated from the three datasets was 81% (10%) at a sample size of 60. In one of the datasets (CONSORT-SPI), a ≥80% replicability was reached at a sample size of 80. On average, increasing the sample size from 80 to 160 increased the replicability of results by a further 3% and reduced variability by 1%. For subgroup analysis based on participant characteristics (eg, gender, age, professional role), using resampled samples of 20 to 100 showed that a sample size of 20 to 30 resulted to moderate replicability levels of 64% to 77%.

conclusionWe found that a minimum sample size of 60-80 participants in multistakeholder Delphi surveys provides a high level of replicability (≥80%) in the results. For Delphi studies limited to individual stakeholder groups (such as researchers, clinicians, patients), a sample size of 20 to 30 per group may be sufficient.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignSample SizeSurveys and QuestionnairesConsensusDelphiExpert panelQualitative researchQuantitative researchReplicabilityResamplingSample sizeStability

Identifiers

PMID39069013
PMCPMC7617918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.