Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39068626›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024

Learning curve of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy by a single surgeon with extensive laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy experience.

Menghua Dai, Pengyu Li, Qiang Xu, Lixin Chen, Wenjing Liu, Xianlin Han, Qiaofei Liu, Haomin Chen, Shuai Yuan, Weijie Chen and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Menghua Dai *Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), No. 1, Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. daimh@pumch.cn.
Pengyu Li *Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), No. 1, Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Qiang Xu *Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), No. 1, Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Lixin ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), No. 1, Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Wenjing LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), No. 1, Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Xianlin HanDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), No. 1, Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Qiaofei LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), No. 1, Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Haomin ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), No. 1, Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Shuai YuanDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), No. 1, Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Weijie ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), No. 1, Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Quan LiaoDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), No. 1, Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Taiping ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), No. 1, Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Junchao GuoDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), No. 1, Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the development of robotic systems, robotic pancreatoduodenectomies (RPDs) have been increasingly performed. However, the number of cases required by surgeons with extensive laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) experience to overcome the learning curve of RPD remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to analyze and explore the impact of different phases of the learning curve of RPD on perioperative outcomes. Clinical data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed for 100 consecutive patients who underwent RPD performed by a single surgeon. This surgeon had previous experience with LPD, having performed 127 LPDs with low morbidity. The learning curve for RPD was analyzed using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method based on operation time, and perioperative outcomes were compared between the learning and proficiency phases. Between April 2020 and November 2022, one hundred patients (56 men, 44 women) were included in this study. Based on the CUSUM curve of operation time, the learning curve for RPD was divided into two phases: phase I was the learning phase (cases 1-33) and phase II was the proficiency phase (cases 34-100). The operation time during the proficiency phase was significantly shorter than that during the learning phase. In the learning phase of RPD, no significant increases were observed in estimated blood loss, conversion to laparotomy, severe complications, postoperative pancreatic hemorrhage, clinical pancreatic fistula, or other perioperative complications compared to the proficiency phases of either RPD or LPD. A surgeon with extensive prior experience in LPD can safely surmount the RPD learning curve without increasing morbidity in the learning phase. The proficiency was significantly improved after accumulating experience of 33 RPD cases.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyLearning CurveOperative TimePancreaticoduodenectomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSurgeonsDa VinciLaparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomyLearning curveRobotic pancreatoduodenectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.