ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2024
ChecKAP: A Checklist for Reporting a Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) Study.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
71 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of Nurse-Led WIKAP Intervention on Hypoglycemia Coping Confidence and Outcomes in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Zhijiang, China.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Trial
- Awareness regarding the epidemiology, prevention, treatment, and consequences of viral hepatitis among a predominantly young adult population in the Podillia region (Ukraine): a cross-sectional study.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Exploration of Factors Associated with Clinicians' Opioid Prescribing "Typologies" for Acute Pain.Journal of prevention (2022) · 2026Article
- Renal care readiness and gaps in early detection of sickle cell nephropathy in children in North Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo: an exploratory cross-sectional study.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Self-Reported Knowledge, Attitudes, Perceptions, and Readiness Regarding AI Among Obstetrics and Gynecology Trainees: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Bridging the Knowledge-Practice Gap in Breast Cancer Awareness: A Nationwide Online Cross-Sectional KAP Study Among Adult Females in Nigeria.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Assessing awareness to aid action: Stakeholders' perception of invasive alien species in a metropolis from the Global South.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Instruments for assessing healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding deprescribing: a scoping review.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Review
- Article
- Sexual Health in Islam: Constructing a Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) Scale for the Jordanian Context.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceived Acceptability of Art Therapy Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Nanjing, China.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Instruments for Assessing Population Knowledge of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) and/or Post-exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) for HIV: A Scoping Review.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Article
- Development and Psychometric Validation of a Questionnaire Assessing Gynecologic Oncology Nurses' Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice in Providing Sexual Health Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cutaneous leishmaniasis disease and vector related knowledge in endemic communities in Ghana: A 2023 cross-sectional study in the Nkwanta South District.Journal of public health research · 2026Article
- Comparison of tick surveillance approaches: Utilizing trailhead tick-check stations to support tick surveillance and community education.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- A structured framework for the development of knowledge, attitudes, and practices surveys addressing brown dog tick-associated Rocky Mountain spotted fever.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Perceived knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare professionals toward the use of noninvasive neuromodulation technology in the treatment of cognitive disorders.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Learning about the genetic risk in my family: Preferences of Italian nurses.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) model is a foundational tool in public health research. KAP surveys play a vital role in this process by gauging a population's current level of knowledge about a specific health issue. Rigorous evaluation is essential for ensuring the validity and reliability of KAP studies. Therefore, in this study, a comprehensive checklist for reporting Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAP) Studies was developed. METHODOLOGY: This study was conducted using a systematic six-step roadmap. A comprehensive review of available relevant quality assessment tools led to the development of specific new items. An expert panel reviewed the initial draft, and after corrections were made, the second draft was finalized and subjected to psychometric analysis by experts.
resultsThe development of ChecKAP (Checklist for Reporting Items for Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice) represents a significant contribution to KAP studies. The final tool consists of 46 items across 8 fields: title (1 item), abstract (6 items), keywords (1 item), introduction (6 items), method (11 items), findings (7 items), discussion (15 items), and conclusion (1 item).
conclusionChecKAP assesses the inherent complexity of KAP research methods and ensures consistent reporting. It fills an important gap in the KAP research literature and serves a dual purpose. First, it acts as a quality assessment tool for reviewers, enabling them to evaluate the methodological rigor and clarity of submitted manuscripts. Second, it serves as a guideline for authors, promoting a more systematic and transparent approach to reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.