Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39068537›Full record

ArticleJournal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale

Alternative Sources of Cautery in Thyroid Surgery and the Risk of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injury: A Retrospective, Risk-Adjusted Analysis From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Corliss A E Best, Jumana Hussain, Stephanie Johnson-Obaseki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Corliss A E BestThe Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Jumana HussainThe Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Stephanie Johnson-ObasekiThe Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesA risk-adjusted analysis was completed using data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to compare the rates of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in thyroid surgery using traditional versus alternative sources of cautery (defined as Harmonic Scalpel

methodsA retrospective cohort study was completed using the NSQIP database on adult patients who underwent total thyroidectomy, subtotal thyroidectomy, or completion thyroidectomy between 2016 and 2018. The primary outcome measure was recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. The exposure variable was use of conventional or alternative sources of cautery. Multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to control for potentially confounding variables.

resultsA total of 13,961 cases were analyzed; 9450 used alternative sources of cautery compared to 4511 where traditional cautery was used. There was no significant difference in rates of postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve injury between the 2 sources of cautery compared.

conclusionsRisk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury should not be a factor when choosing method of cautery for thyroid surgery. Therefore, other factors like cost-effectiveness can be considered.

Indexed as

CauteryQuality ImprovementRecurrent Laryngeal Nerve InjuriesThyroidectomyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesUnited Statescauteryrecurrent laryngeal nerve injurythyroid

Identifiers

PMID39068537
PMCPMC11284774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.