Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39068494›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2024

Perspectives of key interest groups regarding supervised Consumption sites (SCS) and novel virtual harm reduction services / overdose response hotlines and applications: a qualitative Canadian study.

Boogyung Seo, William Rioux, Adrian Teare, Nathan Rider, Stephanie Jones, Pamela Taplay, S Monty Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Boogyung SeoDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, 2J2.00 Walter C Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, 8440 112 St. NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R7, Canada.
William RiouxDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, 2J2.00 Walter C Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, 8440 112 St. NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R7, Canada.
Adrian TeareCollege of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Nathan RiderCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Stephanie JonesThree Hive Consulting, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Pamela TaplayGrenfell Ministries, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
S Monty GhoshDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, 2J2.00 Walter C Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, 8440 112 St. NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R7, Canada. ghosh@ualberta.ca.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Grant 181006Health Canada's Substance Use and Addictions Program (SUAP) Grant 2122-HQ-000021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupervised consumption sites (SCS) and overdose prevention sites (OPS) have been implemented across Canada to mitigate harms associated with illicit substance use. Despite their successes, they still contend with challenges that limit their accessibility and uptake. Overdose response hotlines and apps are novel virtual technologies reminiscent of informal "spotting" methods that may address some of the limitations. Here, we strove to qualitatively examine the factors that may encourage or deter utilization of these virtual services and SCS.

methodsA total of 52 participants across Canada were recruited using convenience and snowball sampling methods. These included people with lived and living experience of substance use, family members of people with lived experience, healthcare providers, community harm reduction workers, and virtual harm reduction operators. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted and inductive thematic analysis was performed to identify the themes pertaining to SCS and virtual harm reduction.

resultsParticipants viewed overdose response hotline and apps as an opportunity to consume substances without being hindered by logistical barriers (e.g., wait times), fear of law enforcement, invasion of privacy, and more. They also noted that these virtual services provided more flexibility for clients who opt for routes of consumption that are not supported by SCS, such as smoking. Overall, SCS was perceived to be better than virtual services at facilitating social connection, providing additional resources/referrals, as well as prompt response to overdose.

conclusionIn sum, participants viewed SCS and virtual services as filling different needs and gaps. This study adds to a growing body of literature which informs how virtual harm reduction services can serve as useful adjunct to more standard harm reduction methods.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseHarm ReductionHotlinesAdultCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsNeedle-Exchange ProgramsQualitative ResearchSubstance-Related DisordersTelemedicineOverdose prevention sitesOverdose response hotlines and appsSpottingSubstance useSupervised consumption sitesVirtual overdose response services

Identifiers

PMID39068494
PMCPMC11282589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.