Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39068466›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2024

Starch phosphorylation-A needle in a haystack.

Julia Compart, Ardha Apriyanto, Joerg Fettke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia CompartBiopolymer Analytics, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl- Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, Building 20, Potsdam-Golm, Germany.
Ardha ApriyantoBiopolymer Analytics, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl- Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, Building 20, Potsdam-Golm, Germany.
Joerg FettkeBiopolymer Analytics, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl- Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, Building 20, Potsdam-Golm, Germany. fettke@uni-potsdam.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phosphoesterification is the only naturally occurring covalent starch modification identified to date, and it has a major impact on overall starch metabolism. The incorporation of phosphate groups mediated by dikinases [α-glucan, water dikinase (GWD), EC 2.7.9.4; phosphoglucan, water dikinase (PWD), EC 2.7.9.5] massively alters the starch granule properties; however, previous studies did not determine whether the starch-related dikinases bind the phosphate to the glucosyl units within the amylopectin molecules in a specific pattern or randomly. In order to answer this challenging question, a number of approaches were initially pursued until a protocol could be established that enabled a massive step forward in the in vitro analysis of phosphorylated glucan chains obtained from starch. For this purpose, phosphorylation by GWD was investigated, including the final state of phosphorylation i.e., the state of substrate saturation when GWD lacks further free hydroxyl groups at OH-C6 for the catalysis of monophosphate esters. Since the separated phosphorylated glucan chains were required for the analysis, isoamylase digestion was performed to cleave the α-1,6-glycosidic bonds and to allow for the removal of the huge number of existing neutral chains by means of anion exchange chromatography. Via Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight (MALDI-TOF) MS and MALDI-MS/MS, the phosphorylated α-glucan chains were analysed, and the position of the phosphate group within the chain in relation to the reducing end was determined. Here, we demonstrate a protocol that enables the analysis of phosphorylated oligosaccharides, even in small quantities.

Indexed as

GlucanMALDI-fTOF MSMass spectrometryMS/MSPhosphoglucansReducing endsStarchStarch phosphorylationα-glucan, water dikinase

Identifiers

PMID39068466
PMCPMC11282765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.