Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39068360›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Inferring Novel Cells in Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing Data.

Ziyi Li, Peng Yang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ziyi LiDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. zli16@mdanderson.org.
Peng YangDepartment of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a powerful technology that allows researchers to study gene expression heterogeneity within a tissue or cell population. One of the major advantages of scRNA-seq is that it allows researchers to identify and characterize novel cell types or subpopulations within a tissue that may be missed by traditional bulk RNA-sequencing methods. Although many existing methods have been developed to recognize known cell types, inferring novel cells may still be challenging in routine scRNA-seq analysis. Here we describe three lines of methods for inferring novel cells: unsupervised and outlier-detection-based methods, supervised and semi-supervised methods, and copy number variation (CNV)-based methods, as well as the corresponding situations that each method applies. We also provide implementation code and example usages to illustrate the available methods.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisAlgorithmsAnimalsComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingHumansRNA-SeqSoftwareCopy number variationNovel cell detectionSingle-cell RNA-seqSupervised annotationUnsupervised clustering

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.