Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39068355›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Inferring Interaction Networks from Transcriptomic Data: Methods and Applications.

Vikram Singh, Vikram Singh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vikram SinghCentre for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Central University of Himachal Pradesh, Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Vikram SinghCentre for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Central University of Himachal Pradesh, Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh, India. vikramsingh@cuhimachal.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptomic data is a treasure trove in modern molecular biology, as it offers a comprehensive viewpoint into the intricate nuances of gene expression dynamics underlying biological systems. This genetic information must be utilized to infer biomolecular interaction networks that can provide insights into the complex regulatory mechanisms underpinning the dynamic cellular processes. Gene regulatory networks and protein-protein interaction networks are two major classes of such networks. This chapter thoroughly investigates the wide range of methodologies used for distilling insightful revelations from transcriptomic data that include association-based methods (based on correlation among expression vectors), probabilistic models (using Bayesian and Gaussian models), and interologous methods. We reviewed different approaches for evaluating the significance of interactions based on the network topology and biological functions of the interacting molecules and discuss various strategies for the identification of functional modules. The chapter concludes with highlighting network-based techniques of prioritizing key genes, outlining the centrality-based, diffusion- based, and subgraph-based methods. The chapter provides a meticulous framework for investigating transcriptomic data to uncover assembly of complex molecular networks for their adaptable analyses across a broad spectrum of biological domains.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksTranscriptomeBayes TheoremHumansProtein Interaction MappingProtein Interaction MapsBayesian modelCoexpression networksGaussian modelGene regulatory networksInterologous networksProtein interaction networksTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID39068355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.