Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39068348›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2024

Machine learning-based prediction model of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis after stroke.

Lingling Liu, Liping Li, Juan Zhou, Qian Ye, Dianhuai Meng, Guangxu Xu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lingling Liu *Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No.300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Liping Li *Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No.300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Juan Zhou *Department of Ultrasonography, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No.300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Qian YeDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No.300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Dianhuai MengDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No.300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China. dhdream@126.com.
Guangxu XuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No.300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China. xuguangxu@njmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5301-5001

Funding

Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Program No.BE2021012-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to apply machine learning (ML) techniques to develop and validate a risk prediction model for post-stroke lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) based on patients' limb function, activities of daily living (ADL), clinical laboratory indicators, and DVT preventive measures. We retrospectively analyzed 620 stroke patients. Eight ML models-logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), neural network (NN), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), Bayesian (NB), and K-nearest neighbor (KNN)-were used to build the model. These models were extensively evaluated using ROC curves, AUC, PR curves, PRAUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and clinical decision curves (DCA). Shapley's additive explanation (SHAP) was used to determine feature importance. Finally, based on the optimal ML algorithm, different functional feature set models were compared with the Padua scale to select the best feature set model. Our results indicated that the RF algorithm demonstrated superior performance in various evaluation metrics, including AUC (0.74/0.73), PRAUC (0.58/0.58), accuracy (0.75/0.77), and sensitivity (0.78/0.80) in both the training set and test set. DCA analysis revealed that the RF model had the highest clinical net benefit. SHAP analysis showed that D-dimer had the most significant influence on DVT, followed by age, Brunnstrom stage (lower limb), prothrombin time (PT), and mobility ability. The RF algorithm can predict post-stroke DVT to guide clinical practice.

Indexed as

Lower ExtremityMachine LearningStrokeVenous ThrombosisActivities of Daily LivingAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesDVTMachine learningPrediction modelStroke

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.