Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39068328›Full record

SynthesisPediatric cardiology2025

Ultrasound-Guided Versus Palpation-Guided Techniques to Achieve Vascular Access in Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Ahmed A Ibrahim, Abdallah R Allam, Ahmed Mazen Amin, Mohamed Saad Rakab, Abdulhameed Alhadeethi, Ahmed W Hageen, Abdelrahman Mahmoud, Mohamed Abuelazm, Basel Abdelazeem

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Transradial vs transfemoral secondary access outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ahmed A Ibrahim *Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt. Ahmedabdalaziz33@med.menofia.edu.eg.
Abdallah R Allam *Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt.
Ahmed Mazen AminFaculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mohamed Saad RakabFaculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Abdulhameed AlhadeethiDepartment of General Medicine, Al-Salam Teaching Hospital, Ninevah, Iraq.
Ahmed W HageenFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Abdelrahman MahmoudFaculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Mohamed AbuelazmFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Basel AbdelazeemDepartment of Cardiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric heart surgery is a vital therapeutic option for congenital heart disease, which is one of the most prevalent causes of death in children. Arterial cannulation (AC) and central venous catheter (CVC) are required in pediatric cardiac surgery for continuous monitoring of the central venous pressure (CVP), replacement of fluid or blood products, close hemodynamic monitoring, and frequent sampling for arterial blood gases (ABG). A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved from PubMed, Embase Cochrane, Scopus, and WOS until February 2024. Risk ratio (RR) was used to report dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference (MD) was used to report continuous outcomes, both with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model. Thirteen RCTs with 1060 children were included. Regarding arterial cannulation, the ultrasound-guided technique (US) was associated with a statistically significant increase in successful cannulation [RR: 1.31 with 95% CI (1.10, 1.56), P < 0.0001], and first-attempt success [RR: 1.88 with 95% CI (1.35, 2.63), P < 0.0001]. However, US was not associated with any statistically significant difference in venous cannulation in both outcomes with [RR: 1.13 with 95% CI (0.98, 1.30), P = 0.10], [RR: 1.53 with 95% CI (0.86, 2.71), P = 0.15] respectively. Moreover, US was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the number of attempts either in arterial cannulation with [MD: - 0.73 with 95% CI (- 1.00, - 0.46), P < 0.0001] or in venous cannulation with [MD: - 1.34 with 95% CI (- 2.55, - 0.12), P = 0.03], and the time of attempted cannulation also either in arterial cannulation with [MD: - 2.27 with 95% CI (- 3.38, - 1.16), P < 0.0001] or in venous cannulation with [MD: - 4.13 with 95% CI (- 7.06, - 1.19), P < 0.0001]. US guidance improves successful cannulation rates and first-attempt success in arterial access and reduces the number of attempts and procedural time for arterial and venous access. It was also associated with a lower incidence of complications and procedure failure, particularly in arterial access. However, it was associated with a higher incidence of venous puncture.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresCatheterization, Central VenousCatheterization, PeripheralHeart Defects, CongenitalPalpationUltrasonography, InterventionalChildHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCannulaCardiac surgeryCatheterPediatricsReviewUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID39068328
PMCPMC12296815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.