Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39068322›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of surgical oncology2024

PROMRIINE (PRe-operatory Magnetic Resonance Imaging is INEffective) Study: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Surgical Decisions and Clinical Outcomes in Women with Breast Cancer.

André Mattar, Marcelo Antonini, Andressa Amorim, Evandro Falaci Mateus, Fabio Bagnoli, Francisco Pimentel Cavalcante, Guilherme Novita, Lincon Jo Mori, Marcelo Madeira, Marina Diógenes and 5 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Monitoring Pharmacological Treatment of Breast Cancer with MRI.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

André MattarGrupo Oncoclínicas-SP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. mattar.andre@gmail.com.
Marcelo AntoniniHospital do Servidor Público Estadual - Francisco Morato de Oliveira, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Andressa AmorimHospital da Mulher- SP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Evandro Falaci MateusGrupo Oncoclínicas-SP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Fabio BagnoliGrupo Oncoclínicas-SP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Francisco Pimentel CavalcanteHospital Geral de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Guilherme NovitaGrupo Oncoclínicas-SP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Lincon Jo MoriGrupo Oncoclínicas-SP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Marcelo MadeiraFaculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Marina DiógenesHospital da Mulher- SP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Antônio Luiz FrassonHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Eduardo de Camargo MillenAmericas Oncologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Fabrício Palermo BrenelliUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Lucas Miyake OkumuraValue ArchTech, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Felipe ZerwesPontificia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, São Paulo, RS, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to review and summarize the association between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical outcomes in women with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer from published randomized controlled trials (RCT). MATERIALS AND

methodsTwo independent researchers conducted a systematic review through a comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Medline, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. If there was disagreement between the two reviewers, a third reviewer assessed the manuscript to determine whether it should be included for data extraction. The quality of the papers was assessed using the risk of bias tool, and the evidence was analyzed using GRADE. Meta-analyses using a fixed-effects model were used to estimate the pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

resultsInitially, 21 studies were identified, 15 of which were observational comparative studies. A total of five RCTs were included, and they suggested that preoperative MRI significantly reduced the rate of immediate breast-conserving surgery and increased the risk for mastectomy.

conclusionsFrom the RCT perspective, preoperative MRI for newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer did not improve surgical outcomes and may increase the risk of mastectomy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingPreoperative CareClinical Decision-MakingFemaleHumansMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBreast cancerMagnetic resonance imagingMeta-analysesRandomized controlled trialSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39068322
PMCPMC11466985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.