Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39068268›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2024

Acute Appendicitis After COVID-19 Vaccines in Italy: A Self-Controlled Case Series Study.

Cristina Morciano, Marco Massari, Maria Cutillo, Valeria Belleudi, Gianluca Trifirò, Nadia Mores, Ester Sapigni, Aurora Puccini, Giovanna Zanoni, Manuel Zorzi and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Cristina Morciano *National Centre for Drug Research and Evaluation, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5300-9605
Marco Massari *National Centre for Drug Research and Evaluation, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8442-4238
Maria CutilloNational Centre for Drug Research and Evaluation, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Valeria BelleudiDepartment of Epidemiology ASL Roma 1, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
Gianluca TrifiròDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Nadia MoresInstitute of Pharmacology, Pharmacovigilance, Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Ester SapigniHospital Assistance Service, General Directorate for Personal Care, Health and Welfare, Emilia-Romagna Region, Bologna, Italy.
Aurora PucciniHospital Assistance Service, General Directorate for Personal Care, Health and Welfare, Emilia-Romagna Region, Bologna, Italy.
Giovanna ZanoniImmunology Unit, University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Manuel ZorziCancer Registry of Veneto, Azienda Zero, Padua, Italy.
Giuseppe MonacoDepartment of Health of Lombardy Region, Epidemiology Observatory, Milan, Italy.
Olivia LeoniDepartment of Health of Lombardy Region, Epidemiology Observatory, Milan, Italy.
Stefania Del ZottoRegional Health Authority, Friuli Venezia Giulia Region, Udine, Italy.
Sarah SamezRegional Pharmacovigilance Centre, Trieste, Italy.
Flavia MayerNational Centre for Drug Research and Evaluation, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe MaranoNational Centre for Drug Research and Evaluation, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Francesca Menniti IppolitoNational Centre for Drug Research and Evaluation, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Roberto Da CasNational Centre for Drug Research and Evaluation, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe TraversaNational Centre for Drug Research and Evaluation, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Stefania Spila AlegianiNational Centre for Drug Research and Evaluation, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy. stefania.spila@iss.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0656-1346

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveCases of appendicitis were identified in the pivotal randomized clinical trial on BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine and reported from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine pharmacovigilance systems. Three cohort studies and two self-controlled case series (SCCS) studies evaluating the association between mRNA vaccines and appendicitis reported discordant results. To address this uncertainty, the present study examines in a large population, with a SCCS design, the association between mRNA (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273) and, for the first time, viral vector (ChAdOx1-S and Ad26.COV2-S) COVID-19 vaccines and acute appendicitis.

methodsThe SCCS study design was used to evaluate the association between COVID-19 vaccination and subsequent onset of acute appendicitis. The study was based on record linkage of health archives through TheShinISS application, a statistical tool that locally processes data from regional health care databases according to ad hoc, study-tailored and common data model. The study population included all vaccinated subjects ≥ 12 years old between 27 December 2020 and 30 September 2021. The acute appendicitis was identified through discharge diagnoses of hospital admissions or emergency department visits. Incident cases were defined as those who experienced a first event of acute appendicitis in the study period, excluding subjects with a diagnosis of appendicitis in the previous 5 years. Exposure was defined as the first or second dose of BNT162b2, mRNA-1273 and ChAdOx1-S and the single dose of Ad26.COV2-S. The risk interval was defined as 42 days from the first or second vaccination dose and divided into pre-specified risk subperiods; the reference period was the observation time outside the risk interval. Relative incidences (RI) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated with the SCCS method 'modified for event-dependent exposures', through unbiased estimating equations. The seasonal component was considered as a time-dependent covariate.

resultsIn the 42-day risk interval 1285 incident cases of acute appendicitis occurred: 727 cases after the first dose and 558 cases after the second dose. In the main analysis, no increased risks of acute appendicitis were observed in subjects vaccinated with BNT162b, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1-S and Ad26.COV2-S. The subgroup analyses by sex showed an increased risk in the 14-27 day risk interval, in males after the first dose of mRNA-1273 (RI of 1.71; 95% CI 1.08-2.70, p = 0.02) and in females after the single dose of Ad26.COV2-S (RI of 4.40; 95% CI 1.29-15.01, p = 0.02).

conclusionsThere was no evidence of association of BNT162b, ChAdOx1-S, mRNA-1273 and Ad26.COV2-S with acute appendicitis in the general population. The results of the subgroup analyses by sex needs to be considered with caution. The multiplicity issue cannot be excluded being these hypotheses two of several hypotheses tested. In addition, relevant literature on the biological mechanism of the disease and evidence of similar effects with other vaccines or with the same vaccines are still lacking to provide strong support for a conclusion that there is an harmful effect in males and females with mRNA-1273 and Ad26.COV2-S.

Indexed as

2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273AppendicitisBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAcute DiseaseAd26COVS1AdolescentAdultAgedChAdOx1 nCoV-19ChildFemaleHumansItalyMale2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273Ad26COVS1BNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID39068268
PMCPMC11485117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.