Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39067889›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Primary healthcare in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study in Sweden.

Hanna Fernemark, Maria Hårdstedt, Janna Skagerström, Ida Seing, Elin Karlsson, Per Nilsen, Kristina Görel Ingegerd Schildmeijer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hanna FernemarkDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden Hanna.fernemark@liu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-9029-4406
Maria HårdstedtVansbro Primary Health Care Center, Vansbro, Sweden.
Janna SkagerströmResearch and Development Unit, Region Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden.
Ida SeingDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Elin KarlssonDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Per NilsenDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Kristina Görel Ingegerd SchildmeijerDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Linneuniversitetet, Kalmar, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0895-674X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore how primary healthcare workers in Sweden experienced and perceived the long-term impact of the pandemic on their work.

designThis is a descriptive qualitative study with individual semistructured interviews conducted 2 years after the onset of COVID-19. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach.

settingSwedish primary healthcare units in rural and urban locations.

participants29 healthcare providers (6 registered nurses, 7 assistant nurses, 8 physicians and 8 managers) in Swedish primary healthcare.

resultsData analysis yielded three overarching themes: (1) primary healthcare still affected by the pandemic; (2) primary healthcare changes made permanent; and (3) lessons learnt for handling future crises affecting primary healthcare. The participants experienced a high workload, even after the pandemic, and concluded that it would take years to catch up both mentally and workwise. Four lessons were learnt for future handling of crises that might affect primary healthcare: the importance of creating a cohesive primary healthcare management system to provide clarity regarding recommendations for how primary healthcare personnel should work, the need for management support at all levels, restricting and adapting the flow of information for primary healthcare and ascertaining the necessary resources if primary healthcare is to take on additional tasks.

conclusionTwo years after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, primary healthcare workers in Sweden experienced that their work was still affected by the pandemic. Our findings highlight the importance of ensuring sufficient recovery time and providing opportunities for reflection on the experiences of primary healthcare personnel. This also includes preparedness for managing the heavy workload and strained energy levels of healthcare workers in the aftermath of a crisis.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PersonnelPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchWorkloadAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2SwedenCOVID-19organisational developmentqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID39067889
PMCPMC11284870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.