ArticleBMJ open2024
Improving Miscarriage Prevention Research: a survey exploring the expectations of service users and stakeholders (IMPRESS) - a study protocol for a UK-based survey.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionInterventional clinical trials in recurrent miscarriage use varying expected effect sizes to inform their sample size calculations. Often these are not informed by what stakeholders consider a meaningful treatment effect. Adaptive trial designs may integrate stakeholder views on trial success and futility but the criteria to inform this is lacking. This study aims to understand relevant stakeholder views of what is considered a worthwhile treatment effect for miscarriage prevention interventions and what is acceptable stopping criteria in miscarriage clinical trials. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is designed as a cross-sectional online anonymous survey. The survey presents different scenarios to respondents relating to varying target differences and probability thresholds and explores success and futility criteria for clinical trials. The survey was developed with personal and public involvement (PPI) through focus groups and a PPI partner. Eligible participants will be those with a personal history of miscarriage, including partners, and healthcare professionals who manage patients who experience a miscarriage. Convenience, snowball and purposive sampling techniques will be employed to invite eligible participants to complete the survey. The survey will be accepting responses for an initial 2-week pilot to check validity, prior to being open for a further 12 weeks. Descriptive analyses and linear regression analyses will synthesise the survey results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the NHS Research Ethics Committee North West-Greater Manchester East (23/NW/0322) on 30 January 2024. Informed consent will be obtained prior to survey completion. No personal identifying information will be collected. The results will be published in a relevant scientific journal and communicated through our institutional website.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.