ArticleBMJ open2024
Application of speaking valves in adult patients with tracheostomy: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of modified air-pulse stimulation on tracheotomised patients with dysphagia after stroke: A randomized clinical trial.Medicine · 2026Trial
- Effect of speaking valves on early mobilization of patients in intensive care units following tracheostomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyTrial
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTracheostomy is a common emergency procedure for critically ill patients to secure their airway. The speaking valve is a one-way ventilation valve that is attached to the end of the tracheostomy tube to help the patient remodel subglottic pressure. However, the efficacy and safety of speaking valves in adult patients with tracheostomy remain controversial. The purpose of this protocol is to describe and evaluate the effectiveness, safety and impact on the quality of life of speaking valves in adult patients with tracheostomy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search four English databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science), grey literature websites and reference lists of original studies to screen for studies that might meet the criteria. The two authors will independently screen the literature, extract data and assess the quality and risk of bias of the included studies. The primary outcomes will focus on the patients' swallowing function, vocalisation and quality of life. We will use a fixed effects model or a random effects model based on heterogeneity testing or a descriptive analysis only. The quality of evidence on the effects of interventions will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is based on the literature in the database and does not require the approval of the ethics committee. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal and conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024502906.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.