Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39067765›Full record

ArticleJournal of substance use and addiction treatment2024

Primary care team perspectives on approaches to engaging patients in treatment for opioid use disorder.

Elizabeth J Austin, Jessica Chen, Elena Soyer, Bulat Idrisov, Elsa S Briggs, Yavar Moghimi, Andrew J Saxon, John C Fortney, Brittany E Blanchard, Emily C Williams and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of substance use and addiction treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Elizabeth J AustinDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Department of Clinical Research and Leadership, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C., United States of America. Electronic address: austie@uw.edu.
Jessica ChenDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Elena SoyerDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Bulat IdrisovDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Elsa S BriggsDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Yavar MoghimiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, United States of America.
Andrew J SaxonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Center of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
John C FortneyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Health Services Research & Development, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Advancing Integrated Mental Health Solutions (AIMS) Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Brittany E BlanchardDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Advancing Integrated Mental Health Solutions (AIMS) Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Emily C WilliamsDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Health Services Research & Development, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Anna D RatzliffDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Advancing Integrated Mental Health Solutions (AIMS) Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Monica S RuizDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Ulrich KochDepartment of Clinical Research and Leadership, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C., United States of America.

Funding

Collaborating to Heal Addiction and Mental Health in Primary care (CHAMP)UF1MH121942 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FORTNEY, JOHN C., RATZLIFF, ANNA · 2019 to 2019
$14.8M
NIMH NIH HHS UF1 MH121942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEngagement is a critical component of successful treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). However, rates of patient engagement in OUD treatment, especially in outpatient settings, are variable and often low. Little is known about the specific strategies members of primary care teams use to initiate and encourage ongoing participation in OUD treatment. In a national cohort of primary care clinics in the U.S., we explored the perspectives of primary care team members on the meaning of and approaches to OUD treatment engagement.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 35 providers from multidisciplinary primary care teams in an existing national cohort of 13 clinics across seven states. Teams were delivering OUD treatment via the Collaborative Care Model, a model that combines primary care providers (PCP), behavioral health care managers (BHCM) and consulting psychiatric providers (CPP) in a structured way to provide patient-centered, team-based, and measurement-based care. Interview participants included 14 PCPs, 13 BHCMs, and 8 CPPs. Interviews asked open-ended questions about provider experiences and practices that aided or hindered patient engagement in OUD treatment. Interview transcripts were double-coded by trained qualitative researchers and analyzed using a combination of deductive and inductive approaches to identify themes.

resultsTwo themes emerged that describe provider perspectives on the meaning of engagement: 1) qualifying engagement by the volume of contact with patients, and 2) the need for more multidimensional measures of engagement. Six themes emerged that characterized provider engagement practices: 1) creating an environment of disclosure, 2) normalizing OUD treatment, 3) offering gentle but persistent outreach, 4) providing human connection and encouragement, 5) tailoring treatment to patient needs, and 6) avoiding stigmatizing responses. Analysis identified multiple replicable strategies that providers used to support these engagement practices.

conclusionsProviders consistently apply a range of strategies when trying to engage patients in OUD treatment. Specific engagement strategies used embodied compassion and pragmatism, hallmarks of patient-centered care. Further research is needed to understand the impact of scaling engagement approaches across all care settings.

Indexed as

Opioid-Related DisordersPatient Care TeamPatient ParticipationPrimary Health CareAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalePatient-Centered CareQualitative ResearchUnited StatesOpioid use disorderPatient engagementPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID39067765
PMCPMC11347117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.