ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2024
A Review of Remote Monitoring in Neuromodulation for Chronic Pain Management.
Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pain Medicine Specialist: Championing High-Quality Development for Neuromodulation Technology.Current medical science · 2026Review
- History of SCS and patient-focused innovations: a manufacturer's perspective on the role of technology.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2026Review
- Home use of low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation in clinical practice: an IFCN handbook chapter.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced pain management: the NXTSTIM EcoAI platform.Pain management · 2025Review
- Beyond the Pain Management Clinic: The Role of AI-Integrated Remote Patient Monitoring in Chronic Disease Management - A Narrative Review.Journal of pain research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewNeuromodulation techniques have emerged as promising strategies for managing chronic pain. These techniques encompass various modalities of nerve stimulation, including Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation (DRG-S), and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS). Studies consistently demonstrate significant improvements in pain intensity, quality of life, and reduced opioid usage among patients treated with these modalities. However, neuromodulation presents challenges, such as the need for frequent in-person follow-up visits to ensure proper functionality of the implanted device. Our review explored factors impacting compliance in current neuromodulation users and examined how remote monitoring can mitigate some of these challenges. We also discuss outcomes of recent studies related to remote monitoring of neuromodulation. RECENT
findingsWhile remote monitoring capabilities for neuromodulation devices is an emerging development, there are promising results supporting its role in improving outcomes for chronic pain patients. Higher patient satisfaction, improved pain control, and reduced caretaker burdens have been observed with the use of remote monitoring. This review discusses the current challenges with neuromodulation therapy and highlights the role of remote monitoring. As the field continues to evolve, understanding the importance of remote monitoring for neuromodulation is crucial for optimizing pain management outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39066995What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.