Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39066981›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2024

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Review of Current Evidence.

Jose Carlos Minarro, Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Clinical study of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty versus open reduction and internal plate fixation for treatment of Neer three/four-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jose Carlos MinarroDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Gonda 14, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Joaquin Sanchez-SoteloDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Gonda 14, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. sanchezsotelo.joaquin@mayo.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe aim of this review is to summarize information published in the recent peer-reviewed literature on reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for proximal humerus fractures. RECENT

findingsAlthough there is still some debate regarding which may be the best treatment for proximal humerus fractures in certain age ranges, RSA seems to offer more predictable results than other surgical treatments for elderly patients. Successful tuberosity healing seems to correlate with better outcomes. Recent trends indicate interest in cementless fixation, fracture-specific stems and a 135-degree polyethylene opening angle. RSA provides a successful surgical solution for selected proximal humerus fractures. Indications, design features, and surgical execution have continued to evolve over the last few years.

Indexed as

ComplicationsOutcome studiesProximal humerus fracturesReverse shoulder arthroplastyShoulder

Identifiers

PMID39066981
PMCPMC11371980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.