ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2025
Incidental ablation of ganglionated plexus during atrial fibrillation ablation.
Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardioneuroablation targeting the autonomic nerves within ganglionated plexus (GP) has been used to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). Incidental cardioneuroablation may be an important mechanism by which pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is effective. Automated fractionation mapping software can identify regions of fractionation correlating with GP locations.
objectiveTo examine the overlap between standard PVI ablation lesions and fractionated electrograms suggestive of GP.
methodsWe retrospectively examined AF ablations performed from 2021 to 2023 that included only PVI performed using wide antral circumferential isolation without prospective evaluation of fractionation. Retrospectively, a fractionation map was created (width 10 ms, refractory time 30 ms, roving sensitivity 0.1 mv, and threshold of 2). We evaluated the anatomic overlap between PVI lesions and fractionation in regions associated with GP.
resultsAmong 52 patients (mean 65 (IQR 46-74) years, 82% male, and 69% paroxysmal AF), sites of fractionation corresponding to GP locations were seen in all cases. PVI ablation incidentally overlapped with fractionation in 50 (96%) patients. On average, 26% of the fractionation corresponding with GP locations were incidentally ablated. The highest proportion of fractionated areas were ablated in the left superior (36%) and right superior (31%) GP regions. More complete incidental ablation of these regions was associated with a greater intraprocedural increase in heart rate (ρ = 0.46, p < 0.001), which was subsequently associated with freedom from AF during 15.9 ± 5.2 months of follow-up.
conclusionPatients undergoing AF ablation universally have fractionated electrograms corresponding to anticipated sites of GP. Partial ablation of these regions frequently occurs incidentally during PVI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.