Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39066951›Full record

Observational studyJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024

Efficacy of anti-epidermal growth factor antibody rechallenge in RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional observational study.

Koshiro Fukuda, Hiroki Osumi, Yuri Yoshinami, Akira Ooki, Atsuo Takashima, Takeru Wakatsuki, Hidekazu Hirano, Izuma Nakayama, Kota Ouchi, Ryoichi Sawada and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Koshiro Fukuda *Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0464-8923
Hiroki Osumi *Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4742-0446
Yuri YoshinamiGastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira OokiDepartment of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7618-5775
Atsuo TakashimaGastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeru WakatsukiDepartment of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1463-3859
Hidekazu HiranoGastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1343-1419
Izuma NakayamaDepartment of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4987-1934
Kota OuchiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Miyagi, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5572-1337
Ryoichi SawadaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2750-9141
Shota FukuokaDepartment of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9460-4486
Mariko OguraDepartment of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1004-8425
Daisuke TakahariDepartment of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2492-6014
Keisho ChinDepartment of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2015-8185
Hirokazu ShojiGastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8922-5227
Natsuko OkitaGastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3990-5048
Ken KatoGastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1733-5072
Naoki IshizukaCenter for Digital Transformation of Healthcare, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5856-9668
Narikazu BokuDepartment of Oncology and General Medicine, IMSUT Hospital, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1438-707X
Kensei YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6887-5709
Eiji ShinozakiDepartment of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan. koshiro.fukuda@jfcr.or.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7448-5894

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) RAS mutant (MT) incidence before salvage-line treatment and the clinicopathological features and molecular biological factors associated with the efficacy of anti-epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody (mAb) rechallenge for tissue RAS/BRAF wild type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

methodsThis multi-institutional retrospective observational study included 74 patients with mCRC with tissue RAS/BRAF WT refractory to first-line chemotherapy containing anti-EGFR mAb. ctDNA RAS status was assessed using the OncoBEAM™ RAS CRC Kit. We explored the clinicopathological features associated with ctDNA RAS status and the factors related to anti-EGFR mAb rechallenge efficacy in multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression.

resultsThe incidence of RAS MT in ctDNA was 40.5% (30/74), which was associated with primary tumor resection (P = 0.016), liver metastasis (P < 0.001), and high tumor marker levels (P < 0.001). Among the 39 patients treated with anti-EGFR mAb rechallenge, those with ctDNA RAS WT showed significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than those with ctDNA RAS MT (median 4.1 vs. 2.7 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39, P = 0.045). Patients who responded to first-line anti-EGFR mAb showed significantly longer PFS (HR = 0.21, P = 0.0026) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.23, P = 0.026) than those with stable disease.

conclusionsThe incidence of ctDNA RAS MT mCRC was 40.5%, which was associated with liver metastases and high tumor volumes. Anti-EGFR mAb rechallenge may be effective for patients with mCRC who responded to first-line chemotherapy containing anti-EGFR mAb. No patients with RAS MT in ctDNA responded to anti-EGFR mAb rechallenge.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCirculating Tumor DNAFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBRAF protein, humanCirculating Tumor DNAEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafAnti-EGFR monoclonal antibodyCirculating tumor DNARAS/BRAF wild-typeRechallengeResponse to first-line anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody

Identifiers

PMID39066951
PMCPMC11283376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.