Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39066812›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2025

MR imaging of penile pathology and prostheses.

Naveen Rajamohan, Harit Kapoor, Aman Khurana, Leslie Nelson, Halemane S Ganesh, Gaurav Khatri, Rashmi T Nair

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Naveen RajamohanDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-9004, USA. naveen.rajamohan@utsouthwestern.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0686-8460
Harit KapoorDepartment of Radiology, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, 800 Rose St. HX315E, Lexington, KY, USA.
Aman KhuranaDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Leslie NelsonDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
Halemane S GaneshDepartment of Radiology, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, 800 Rose St. HX315E, Lexington, KY, USA.
Gaurav KhatriDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-9004, USA.
Rashmi T NairDepartment of Radiology, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, 800 Rose St. HX315E, Lexington, KY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile MRI is a vital yet underutilized diagnostic tool that provides detailed information crucial for managing various penile pathologies. Due to its infrequent use, many radiology trainees lack confidence in interpreting these exams. This article reviews the anatomy, key technical considerations, and interpretive pearls for penile trauma, Peyronie's disease, priapism, penile neoplasms, prosthesis evaluation, and a few miscellaneous conditions. Through illustrative case examples, this review aims to enhance the understanding and proficiency of radiologists in performing and interpreting penile MRI in these clinical scenarios.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPenile DiseasesPenile ProsthesisPenisHumansMalePenile MRIPenile prosthesisPenile trauma

Identifiers

PMID39066812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.