ArticleArchives of microbiology2024
Investigating the pro-inflammatory differentiation of macrophages with bacterial ghosts in potential infection control.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut microbiota-immune crosstalk in osteoarthritis: pathogenic mechanisms and emerging therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Effect of TRIM67 knockout on inflammation and macrophage survival in Salmonella Typhimurium-infected mice.Archives of microbiology · 2025Article
- Harnessing Ultrasonic Technologies to TreatMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the complex realm of bacterial infections, particularly those caused by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), macrophages play a pivotal role in orchestrating the immune response. During the initial stages of infection, the monocytes give rise to macrophages with a pro-inflammatory (M1 type) behaviour, engulfing and neutralizing the invading pathogens. However, under the sustained influence of S. aureus infection, monocytes can undergo a transition into an anti-inflammatory M2 state (pro-infection) rather than the M1 state (anti-infection), thereby compromising effective infection control. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a strategy that would preserve the pro-inflammatory functions of macrophages, in a safe and controlled manner. For this, we focused on harnessing the potential of S. aureus-derived ghost cells (GCs) which are non-live empty envelopes of bacterial cells, but with the antigenic determinants intact. Through a unique Lugol's-iodine treatment, we generated GCs and characterization of these GCs using gel electrophoresis, FTIR, flow cytometry, TEM, and SEM confirmed their structural integrity. Following this, we assessed the extend of cellular association of the GCs with RAW267.4 macrophages, and observed an immediate interaction between the two, as evident from the flowcytometry and microscopy studies. We then performed macrophage polarisation on a human monocyte-macrophage model cell line, THP-1. Our findings revealed that GCs effectively activated macrophages, and promoted a pro-inflammatory polarisation with the expression of M1 differentiation markers (CD86, TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12) evaluated through both qPCR and ELISA. Interestingly an intermediary expression of M2 markers viz., CD206 and IL-10 was also observed, but was overruled by the enhanced expression of M1 markers at a later time point. Overall, our study introduces a novel approach utilizing GCs to guide naïve macrophages towards M1 subtypes, thereby potentiating immune responses during microbial infections. This innovative strategy can modulate macrophage function, ultimately improving outcomes in S. aureus infections and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.