Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39066804›Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2024

Clinical prediction model for pediatric lymphadenopathy: enhancing diagnostic precision and treatment decision making.

Tipsuda Tangsriwong, Thipsumon Tangsiwong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tipsuda TangsriwongDepartment of Surgery, Buddhachinaraj Hospital, 90 Srithamtraipidok Road, Nai Mueang Subdistrict, Mueang Phitsanulok District, Phitsanulok, 65000, Thailand. tiffefai@gmail.com.
Thipsumon TangsiwongDepartment of Radiology, Buddhachinaraj Hospital, Phitsanulok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLymph node enlargement is common in children, with 90% of physiologically palpable lymph nodes. This study aimed to develop a predictive model based on clinical characteristics to enhance the diagnosis of pediatric lymphadenopathy and provide insights into biopsy outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsA clinical prediction rule was developed using a retrospective, cross-sectional design for patients under 15 years who underwent lymph node biopsy from 2012 to 2022. Multivariable risk regression was used to analyze benign and malignant lesions, presenting results through risk difference and AUROC for each group. Predicted probabilities were applied in a logistic regression equation to classify patients' lymphadenopathy as reactive hyperplasia, benign, or malignant.

resultsOf 188 children, 70 (37.2%) had benign lymphadenopathy beyond reactive hyperplasia, and 27 (14.4%) had malignant lymphadenopathy. The predictive model included 12 characteristics such as size, location, duration, associated symptoms, and lymph node examination. Predictive accuracy was 92.2% for benign cases (AUROC = 0.92; 95% CI 0.87-0.96) and 98.6% for malignancy (AUROC = 0.98; 95% CI 0.94-0.99). Overall accuracy for predicting both benign and malignant tumors was 68.3%.

conclusionThe model demonstrated reasonably accurate predictions for the clinical characteristics of pediatric lymphadenopathy. It tended to overestimate malignancy but did not miss diagnoses, aiding in reducing unnecessary lymph node biopsies in benign cases.

Indexed as

LymphadenopathyAdolescentBiopsyChildChild, PreschoolClinical Decision-MakingClinical Decision RulesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantLymph NodesMaleRetrospective StudiesBiopsy outcomesDiagnostic accuracyPediatric lymphadenopathyPredictive model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.