Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39066638›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2025

Challenges in designing a randomized, double-blind noninferiority trial for treatment of acne: The SD-ACNE trial.

John S Barbieri, Susan Ellenberg, Elizabeth Grice, Ann Tierney, Suzette Baez VanderBeek, Maryte Papadopoulos, Jennifer Mason, Anabel Mason, James Dattilo, David J Margolis

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04582383 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Comparative Effectiveness Study of Spironolactone Versus Doxycycline Hyclate for the Treatment of Acne in Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04582383 phase4active not recruitingnot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Comparative Effectiveness Study of Spironolactone Versus Doxycycline Hyclate for the Treatment of Acne in Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2022 to 2027Enrolled350ConditionsAcneArmsSpironolactone, Doxycycline Hyclate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

John S BarbieriDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5467-4102
Susan EllenbergCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2364-5253
Elizabeth GriceDepartment of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ann TierneyCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6912-4197
Suzette Baez VanderBeekDepartment of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-7227-6420
Maryte PapadopoulosDepartment of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jennifer MasonDepartment of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Anabel MasonDepartment of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
James DattiloCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David J MargolisDepartment of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Study Design and Data AnalysisP30AR069589 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Elizabeth Anne Grice · 2016 to 2026
$8.6M
A randomized, double-blind, multi-center comparative effectiveness study of spironolactone versus doxycycline hyclate for the treatment of acne in womenU01AR079752 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI David Joel Margolis · 2021 to 2026
$4.2M
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR069589NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR079752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsExcessive use of antibiotics has led to development of antibiotic resistance and other antibiotic-associated complications. Dermatologists prescribe more antibiotics per clinician than any other major specialty, with much of this use for acne. Alternative acne treatments are available but are used much less often than antibiotics, at least partially because dermatologists feel that they are less effective. Spironolactone, a hormonal therapy with antiandrogen effects that can address the hormonal pathogenesis of acne, may represent a therapeutic alternative to oral antibiotics for women with acne. However, the comparative effects of spironolactone and oral antibiotics in the treatment of acne have not been definitively studied. The Spironolactone versus Doxycycline for Acne: A Comparative Effectiveness, Noninferiority Evaluation (SD-ACNE) trial aims to answer whether spironolactone, in addition to standard topical therapy, is noninferior to doxycycline (an oral antibiotic) for women with acne. Several interesting challenges arose in the development of this study, including determining acceptability of the comparative regimens to participating dermatologists, identifying data to support a noninferiority margin, and establishing a process for unblinding participants after they completed the study while maintaining the blind for study investigators.

methodsWe present the scientific and clinical rationale for the decisions made in the design of the trial, including input from key stakeholders through a Delphi consensus process.

resultsThe Spironolactone versus Doxycycline for Acne: A Comparative Effectiveness, Noninferiority Evaluation trial (NCT04582383) is being conducted at a range of community and academic sites in the United States. To maximize external validity and inform clinical practice, the study is designed with broad eligibility criteria and no prohibition of use of topical medications. Participants in the trial will be randomized to receive either spironolactone 100 mg/day or doxycycline hyclate 100 mg/day for 16 weeks. The primary outcome is the absolute decrease in inflammatory lesion count, and we have established a noninferiority margin of four inflammatory lesions. Secondary outcomes include the percentage of participants achieving Investigator Global Assessment success, change in quality of life, and microbiome changes and diversity.

conclusionsThe Spironolactone versus Doxycycline for Acne: A Comparative Effectiveness, Noninferiority Evaluation trial will have substantial implications for the treatment of acne and antibiotic stewardship. In addition, this study will provide important information on the effect of these systemic agents on the development of changes to the microbiome and antibiotic resistance in a healthy population of patients.

Indexed as

Acne VulgarisAnti-Bacterial AgentsDoxycyclineSpironolactoneAdministration, OralDouble-Blind MethodEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignAnti-Bacterial AgentsDoxycyclineSpironolactoneAcneantibiotic resistanceantibioticsdoxycyclinemicrobiomespironolactone

Identifiers

PMID39066638
PMCPMC11770193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.