Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39066411›Full record

ArticleVaccines2024

Capturing the Value of Vaccination within Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics-Practical Considerations for Expanding Valuation by Including Key Concepts.

Eliana Biundo, Mariia Dronova, Annie Chicoye, Richard Cookson, Nancy Devlin, T Mark Doherty, Stephanie Garcia, Antonio J Garcia-Ruiz, Louis P Garrison, Terry Nolan and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Closing the gap: do we need a framework for embedding equity in health technology assessment?International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Eliana BiundoGSK, Building W23, 20 Avenue Fleming, 1300 Wavre, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1207-6366
Mariia DronovaPutnam PHMR, 30-701 Krakow, Poland.
Annie ChicoyeAC Health Consulting, Sciences Po, 75007 Paris, France.
Richard CooksonCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0052-996X
Nancy DevlinHealth Economics Unit, Centre for Health Policy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia.
T Mark DohertyGSK, Building W23, 20 Avenue Fleming, 1300 Wavre, Belgium.
Stephanie GarciaGSK, Building W23, 20 Avenue Fleming, 1300 Wavre, Belgium.
Antonio J Garcia-RuizDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6423-6993
Louis P GarrisonSchool of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Terry NolanHealth Economics Unit, Centre for Health Policy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6018-3863
Maarten PostmaDepartment of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 AB Groningen, The Netherlands.
David SalisburyProgramme for Global Health, Royal Institute of International Affairs, Chatham House, London SW1Y 4LE, UK.
Hiral ShahGSK, Building W23, 20 Avenue Fleming, 1300 Wavre, Belgium.
Shazia SheikhGSK, Building W23, 20 Avenue Fleming, 1300 Wavre, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3465-6561
Richard SmithCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter EX1 2HZ, UK.
Mondher ToumiCreativ-Ceutical, 1724 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Jurgen WasemInstitute for Health Care Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45127 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9653-168X
Ekkehard BeckGSK, Building W23, 20 Avenue Fleming, 1300 Wavre, Belgium.

Funding

GlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) VEO-000023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the development of a value of vaccination (VoV) framework for health technology assessment/cost-effectiveness analysis (HTA/CEA), and identification of three vaccination benefits for near-term inclusion in HTA/CEA, this final paper provides decision makers with methods and examples to consider benefits of health systems strengthening (HSS), equity, and macroeconomic gains. Expert working groups, targeted literature reviews, and case studies were used. Opportunity cost methods were applied for HSS benefits of rotavirus vaccination. Vaccination, with HSS benefits included, reduced the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) by 1.4-50.5% (to GBP 11,552-GBP 23,016) depending on alternative conditions considered. Distributional CEA was applied for health equity benefits of meningococcal vaccination. Nearly 80% of prevented cases were among the three most deprived groups. Vaccination, with equity benefits included, reduced the ICER by 22-56% (to GBP 7014-GBP 12,460), depending on equity parameters. Macroeconomic models may inform HTA deliberative processes (e.g., disease impact on the labour force and the wider economy), or macroeconomic outcomes may be assessed for individuals in CEAs (e.g., impact on non-health consumption, leisure time, and income). These case studies show how to assess broader vaccination benefits in current HTA/CEA, providing decision makers with more accurate and complete VoV assessments. More work is needed to refine inputs and methods, especially for macroeconomic gains.

Indexed as

economic evaluationefficiencyhealth equityhealth systems strengtheningmacroeconomicvaccination

Identifiers

PMID39066411
PMCPMC11281546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.