Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39066372›Full record

ArticleVaccines2024

Immunogenicity of the Monovalent Omicron XBB.1.5-Adapted BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccine against XBB.1.5, BA.2.86, and JN.1 Sublineages: A Phase 2/3 Trial.

Juleen Gayed, Vishva Bangad, Xia Xu, Federico Mensa, Mark Cutler, Özlem Türeci, Uǧur Şahin, Kayvon Modjarrad, Kena A Swanson, Annaliesa S Anderson and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05472038 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

AN INTERVENTIONAL, RANDOMIZED, ACTIVE-CONTROLLED, PHASE 1/2/3 STUDY TO INVESTIGATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, AND IMMUNOGENICITY OF BNT162b RNA-BASED VACCINE CANDIDATES IN COVID-19 VACCINE-EXPERIENCED HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS

TypeinterventionalSponsorBioNTech SERan2022 to 2024Enrolled1,453ConditionsSARS-CoV-2 Infection, COVID-19ArmsBNT162b5 Bivalent (WT/OMI BA.2), BNT162b2 Bivalent (WT/OMI BA.1), BNT162b2 Bivalent (WT/OMI BA.4/BA.5), BNT162b5 Bivalent (Original/OMI BA.4/BA.5), BNT162b6 Bivalent (Original/OMI BA.4/BA.5)
NCT05997290 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

A PHASE 2/3 PROTOCOL TO INVESTIGATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, AND IMMUNOGENICITY OF BNT162b2 RNA-BASED VACCINE CANDIDATES FOR SARS-CoV-2 NEW VARIANTS IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS

TypeinterventionalSponsorBioNTech SERan2023 to 2025Enrolled1,051ConditionsSARS-CoV-2 Infection, COVID-19ArmsBNT162b2 (Omi XBB.1.5), BNT162b2 (Omi JN.1), BNT162b2 (Omi KP.2)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Juleen GayedVaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Ltd., Marlow International, Parkway, Marlow SL7 1YL, UK.
Vishva BangadVaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA 19426, USA.
Xia XuVaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA 19426, USA.
Federico MensaBioNTech, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Mark CutlerVaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA.
Özlem TüreciBioNTech, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Uǧur ŞahinBioNTech, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Kayvon ModjarradVaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA.
Kena A SwansonVaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA.
Annaliesa S AndersonVaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA.
Alejandra GurtmanVaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA.
Nicholas KitchinVaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Ltd., Marlow International, Parkway, Marlow SL7 1YL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1808-3380
C4591054 Study Group

Funding

Pfizer Inc N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report neutralization titer data against contemporary SARS-CoV-2 sublineages from an ongoing, phase 2/3, open-label, clinical trial of a single dose (30 μg) of an Omicron XBB.1.5-adapted BNT162b2 monovalent mRNA vaccine. The trial included healthy participants who had received at least three previous doses of an mRNA vaccine authorized in the United States, with the most recent authorized vaccine dose being a bivalent Omicron BA.4/BA.5-adapted vaccine given at least 150 days before the study vaccination. In this analysis, Omicron XBB.1.5, BA.2.86, and JN.1 serum neutralizing titers were assessed at baseline and at 1 month after vaccination. Analyses were conducted in a subset of participants who were at least 18 years of age (N = 40) and who had evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Immunogenicity was also evaluated in a group of participants who received bivalent BA.4/BA.5-adapted BNT162b2 in another study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05472038) and who were matched demographically to the participants in the current trial. In this analysis, monovalent XBB.1.5-adapted BNT162b2 vaccine elicited higher XBB.1.5, BA.2.86, and JN.1 neutralizing titers than those elicited by bivalent BA.4/BA.5-adapted BNT162b2. Overall geometric mean fold rises in neutralizing titers from baseline to 1 month after vaccination were higher among participants who received XBB.1.5-adapted BNT162b2 than those who received bivalent BA.4/BA.5-adapted BNT162b2 for XBB.1.5 (7.6 vs. 5.6), slightly higher for JN.1 (3.9 vs. 3.5), and similar for BA.2.86 (4.8 vs. 4.9). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05997290.

Indexed as

BA.2.86BNT162b2boosterCOVID-19JN.1OmicronSARS-CoV-2vaccinevariant-adaptedXBB.1.5

Identifiers

PMID39066372
PMCPMC11281410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.