Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39066344›Full record

ArticleVaccines2024

A Computationally Optimized Broadly Reactive Hemagglutinin and Neuraminidase Vaccine Boosts Antibody-Secreting Cells and Induces a Robust Serological Response, Preventing Lung Damage in a Pre-Immune Model.

Pan Ge, Yailin Campos Mota, Robert A Richardson, Ted M Ross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pan GeCenter for Vaccines and Immunology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1728-468X
Yailin Campos MotaFlorida Research and Innovation Center, Cleveland Clinic, Port Saint Lucie, FL 34987, USA.
Robert A RichardsonCenter for Vaccines and Immunology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Ted M RossCenter for Vaccines and Immunology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1947-7469

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) surface proteins are the primary and secondary immune targets for most influenza vaccines. In this study, H2, H5, H7, N1, and N2 antigens designed by the computationally optimized broadly reactive antigen (COBRA) methodology were incorporated into an adjuvant-formulated vaccine to assess the protective efficacy and immune response against A/Hong Kong/125/2017 H7N9 virus challenge in pre-immune mice. The elicited antibodies bound to H2, H5, H7, N1, and N2 wild-type antigens; cH6/1 antigens; and cH7/3 antigens, with hemagglutinin inhibition (HAI) activity against broad panels of the H2Nx, H5Nx, and H7Nx influenza strains. Mice vaccinated with the pentavalent COBRA HA/NA vaccine showed little to no weight loss, no clinical signs of diseases, and were protected from mortality when challenged with the lethal H7N9 virus. Virus titers in the lungs of vaccinated mice were lower and cleared more rapidly than in mock-vaccinated mice. Some vaccinated mice showed no detectable lung injury or inflammation. Antibody-secreting cells were significantly increased in COBRA-vaccinated mice, with higher total Ig and H7-specific ASC. Thus, the combination of H2, H5, H7, N1, and N2 COBRA antigens presents a potential for the formulation of a universal influenza virus vaccine.

Indexed as

antibody-secreting cells (ASCs)hemagglutinin (HA)influenzalung inflammationneuraminidase (NA)serological responsesvaccine

Identifiers

PMID39066344
PMCPMC11281495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.