ArticleViruses2024
Assessing pH-Dependent Conformational Changes in the Fusion Peptide Proximal Region of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein.
Article in Viruses, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Residues Ser83, Arg85, Tyr88, Asn124, and Lys192 of C-Terminal Lipid-Associated Membrane Hemagglutinin AffectMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Functional and structural basis of Omicron BA.3.2.1 spike.Cell reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One of the entry mechanisms of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus into host cells involves endosomal acidification. It has been proposed that under acidic conditions, the fusion peptide proximal region (FPPR) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein acts as a pH-dependent switch, modulating immune response accessibility by influencing the positioning of the receptor binding domain (RBD). This would provide indirect coupling of RBD opening to the environmental pH. Here, we explored this possible pH-dependent conformational equilibrium of the FPPR within the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. We analyzed hundreds of experimentally determined spike structures from the Protein Data Bank and carried out pH-replica exchange molecular dynamics to explore the extent to which the FPPR conformation depends on pH and the positioning of the RBD. A meta-analysis of experimental structures identified alternate conformations of the FPPR among structures in which this flexible regions was resolved. However, the results did not support a correlation between the FPPR conformation and either RBD position or the reported pH of the cryo-EM experiment. We calculated pKa values for titratable side chains in the FPPR region using PDB structures, but these pKa values showed large differences between alternate PDB structures that otherwise adopt the same FPPR conformation type. This hampers the comparison of pKa values in different FPPR conformations to rationalize a pH-dependent conformational change. We supplemented these PDB-based analyses with all-atom simulations and used constant-pH replica exchange molecular dynamics to estimate pKa values in the context of flexibility and explicit water. The resulting titration curves show good reproducibility between simulations, but they also suggest that the titration curves of the different FPPR conformations are the same within the error bars. In summary, we were unable to find evidence supporting the previously published hypothesis of an FPPR pH-dependent equilibrium: neither from existing experimental data nor from constant-pH MD simulations. The study underscores the complexity of the spike system and opens avenues for further exploration into the interplay between pH and SARS-CoV-2 viral entry mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.