Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39066214›Full record

ReviewViruses2024

Elaheh Alipour-Khezri, Mikael Skurnik, Gholamreza Zarrini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Lipopolysaccharide-targeting treatments for multidrug-resistantExpert opinion on therapeutic targets · 2026
    Review
  5. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Newly isolatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Characterisation of a NovelPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Understanding phage Receptor-binding protein interaction with host surface receptor: the key for phage-Mediated detection and elimination of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Viruses · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elaheh Alipour-KhezriDepartment of Animal Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 51368, Iran.ORCID 0009-0003-7839-3406
Mikael SkurnikHuman Microbiome Research Program, and Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00290 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8791-9260
Gholamreza ZarriniDepartment of Animal Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 51368, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1087-0769

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance poses a serious risk to contemporary healthcare since it reduces the number of bacterial illnesses that may be treated with antibiotics, particularly for patients with long-term conditions like cystic fibrosis (CF). People with a genetic predisposition to CF often have recurrent bacterial infections in their lungs due to a buildup of sticky mucus, necessitating long-term antibiotic treatment.

Indexed as

Cystic FibrosisPhage TherapyPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsPseudomonas PhagesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriophagesHumansAnti-Bacterial Agentsbacteriophagecystic fibrosisphage therapyPseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID39066214
PMCPMC11281547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.