Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39066146›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Exploring the Real-Time Variability and Complexity of Sitting Patterns in Office Workers with Non-Specific Chronic Spinal Pain and Pain-Free Individuals.

Eduarda Oliosi, Afonso Júlio, Phillip Probst, Luís Silva, João Paulo Vilas-Boas, Ana Rita Pinheiro, Hugo Gamboa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eduarda OliosiLaboratory for Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics (LIBPhys-UNL), Faculty of Sciences and Technology, NOVA University of Lisbon, 2820-001 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1002-4295
Afonso JúlioLaboratory for Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics (LIBPhys-UNL), Faculty of Sciences and Technology, NOVA University of Lisbon, 2820-001 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID 0009-0005-3066-9578
Phillip ProbstLaboratory for Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics (LIBPhys-UNL), Faculty of Sciences and Technology, NOVA University of Lisbon, 2820-001 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3239-9813
Luís SilvaLaboratory for Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics (LIBPhys-UNL), Faculty of Sciences and Technology, NOVA University of Lisbon, 2820-001 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9811-0571
João Paulo Vilas-BoasCentre for Research, Training, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Porto Biomechanics Laboratory (LABIOMEP), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4000-000 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4109-2939
Ana Rita PinheiroInstitute of Biomedicine (iBiMED), School of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3800-000 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4310-7652
Hugo GamboaLaboratory for Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics (LIBPhys-UNL), Faculty of Sciences and Technology, NOVA University of Lisbon, 2820-001 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4022-7424

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (DSAIPA/AI/0105/2019)Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia RT/BD/152843/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic spinal pain (CSP) is a prevalent condition, and prolonged sitting at work can contribute to it. Ergonomic factors like this can cause changes in motor variability. Variability analysis is a useful method to measure changes in motor performance over time. When performing the same task multiple times, different performance patterns can be observed. This variability is intrinsic to all biological systems and is noticeable in human movement. This study aims to examine whether changes in movement variability and complexity during real-time office work are influenced by CSP. The hypothesis is that individuals with and without pain will have different responses to office work tasks. Six office workers without pain and ten with CSP participated in this study. Participant's trunk movements were recorded during work for an entire week. Linear and nonlinear measures of trunk kinematic displacement were used to assess movement variability and complexity. A mixed ANOVA was utilized to compare changes in movement variability and complexity between the two groups. The effects indicate that pain-free participants showed more complex and less predictable trunk movements with a lower degree of structure and variability when compared to the participants suffering from CSP. The differences were particularly noticeable in fine movements.

Indexed as

Chronic PainMovementSitting PositionAdultBack PainBiomechanical PhenomenaErgonomicsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPosturebiomechanicschronic painmotor adaptionsmovement variabilitynonlinear analysissignal processingspinal pain

Identifiers

PMID39066146
PMCPMC11281106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.