ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Full-Automatic High-Efficiency Mueller Matrix Microscopy Imaging for Tissue Microarray Inspection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper proposes a full-automatic high-efficiency Mueller matrix microscopic imaging (MMMI) system based on the tissue microarray (TMA) for cancer inspection for the first time. By performing a polar decomposition on the sample's Mueller matrix (MM) obtained by a transmissive MMMI system we established, the linear phase retardance equivalent waveplate fast-axis azimuth and the linear phase retardance are obtained for distinguishing the cancerous tissues from the normal ones based on the differences in their polarization characteristics, where three analyses methods including statistical analysis, the gray-level co-occurrence matrix analysis (GLCM) and the Tamura image processing method (TIPM) are used. Previous MMMI medical diagnostics typically utilized discrete slices for inspection under a high-magnification objective (20×-50×) with a small field of view, while we use the TMA under a low-magnification objective (5×) with a large field of view. Experimental results indicate that MMMI based on TMA can effectively analyze the pathological variations in biological tissues, inspect cancerous cervical tissues, and thus contribute to the diagnosis of postoperative cancer biopsies. Such an inspection method, using a large number of samples within a TMA, is beneficial for obtaining consistent findings and good reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.