Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39066054›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Inkjet Printing Magnetostrictive Materials for Structural Health Monitoring of Carbon Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Composite.

Nisar Ahmed, Patrick J Smith, Nicola A Morley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nisar AhmedCentre for Additive Manufacturing, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
Patrick J SmithDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK.
Nicola A MorleyDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK.

Funding

Defence Science and Technology Laboratory DSTLX1000139687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inkjet printing of magnetic materials has increased in recent years, as it has the potential to improve research in smart, functional materials. Magnetostriction is an inherent property of magnetic materials which allows strain or magnetic fields to be detected. This makes it very attractive for sensors in the area of structural health monitoring by detecting internal strains in carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composite. Inkjet printing offers design flexibility for these sensors to influence the magnetic response to the strain. This allows the sensor to be tailored to suit the location of defects in the CFRP. This research has looked into the viability of printable soft magnetic materials for structural health monitoring (SHM) of CFRP. Magnetite and nickel ink dispersions were selected to print using the JetLab 4 drop-on-demand technique. The printability of both inks was tested by selecting substrate, viscosity and solvent evaporation. Clogging was found to be an issue for both ink dispersions. Sonicating and adjusting the jetting parameters helped in distributing the nanoparticles. We found that magnetite nanoparticles were ideal as a sensor as there is more than double increase in saturation magnetisation by 49 Am

Indexed as

ink dispersioninkjet printingJetLab 4magnetitemagnetostrictionnickel

Identifiers

PMID39066054
PMCPMC11280593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.