ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Day-to-Day Variability in Measurements of Respiration Using Bioimpedance from a Non-Standard Location.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental Validation of a Compact and Versatile Bioimpedance Measurement Platform Based on the SENSIPLUS Chip.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Respiratory Monitoring in Motion: An Overview of Wearable Methods and Algorithmic Approaches for Reliable Assessment.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Examining within-session test-retest reliability of four bioimpedance devices among adults across a wide age range.Journal of electrical bioimpedance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-invasive monitoring of pulmonary health may be useful for tracking several conditions such as COVID-19 recovery and the progression of pulmonary edema. Some proposed methods use impedance-based technologies to non-invasively measure the thorax impedance as a function of respiration but face challenges that limit the feasibility, accuracy, and practicality of tracking daily changes. In our prior work, we demonstrated a novel approach to monitor respiration by measuring changes in impedance from the back of the thigh. We reported the concept of using thigh-thigh bioimpedance measurements for measuring the respiration rate and demonstrated a linear relationship between the thigh-thigh bioimpedance and lung tidal volume. Here, we investigate the variability in thigh-thigh impedance measurements to further understand the feasibility of the technique for detecting a change in the respiratory status due to disease onset or recovery if used for long-term in-home monitoring. Multiple within-session and day-to-day impedance measurements were collected at 80 kHz using dry electrodes (thigh) and wet electrodes (thorax) across the five healthy subjects, along with simultaneous gold standard spirometer measurements for three consecutive days. The peak-peak bioimpedance measurements were found to be highly correlated (0.94 ± 0.03 for dry electrodes across thigh; 0.92 ± 0.07 for wet electrodes across thorax) with the peak-peak spirometer tidal volume. The data across five subjects indicate that the day-to-day variability in the relationship between impedance and volume for thigh-thigh measurements is smaller (average of 14%) than for the thorax (40%). However, it is affected by food and water and might limit the accuracy of the respiratory tidal volume.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.