ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Measurement Error Analysis of Seawater Refractive Index: A Measurement Sensor Based on a Position-Sensitive Detector.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-Sensitivity and Temperature-Robust Gas Sensor Based on Magnetically Induced Differential Mode Splitting in InSb Photonic Crystals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- High-Fidelity Modeling of Laser Levels via Pulse-Window Software Lock-In PSD Sensing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The seawater refractive index is an essential parameter in ocean observation, making its high-precision measurement necessary. This can be effectively achieved using a position-sensitive detector-based measurement system. However, in the actual measurement process, the impact of the jitter signal measurement error on the results cannot be ignored. In this study, we theoretically analysed the causes of long jitter signals during seawater refractive index measurements and quantified the influencing factors. Through this analysis, it can be seen that the angle between the two windows in the seawater refractive index measurement area caused a large error in the results, which could be effectively reduced by controlling the angle to within 2.06°. At the same time, the factors affecting the position-sensitive detector's measurement accuracy were analysed, with changes to the background light, the photosensitive surface's size, and the working environment's temperature leading to its reduction. To address the above factors, we first added a 0.9 nm bandwidth, narrow-band filter in front of the detector's photosensitive surface during system construction to filter out any light other than that from the signal light source. To ensure the seawater refractive index's measuring range, a position-sensitive detector with a photosensitive surface size of 4 mm × 4 mm was selected; whereas, to reduce the working environment's temperature variation, we partitioned the measurement system. To validate the testing error range of the optimised test system, standard seawater samples were measured under the same conditions, showing a reduction in the measurement system's jitter signal from 0.0022 mm to 0.0011 mm, before and after optimisation, respectively, as well as a reduction in the refractive index's deviation. The experimental results show that the refractive index of seawater was effectively reduced by adjusting the measurement system's optical path and structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.