ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Using Data Augmentation to Improve the Generalization Capability of an Object Detector on Remote-Sensed Insect Trap Images.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- YOLO12 Down Feather Quality Classification Method Based on A2C2f-CGLU Feature Enhancement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Computer Vision for Monitoring Wild Bees and Wasps: A Structured Literature Review.Ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- Convergence of Multidimensional Sensing: A Review of AI-Enhanced Space-Division Multiplexing in Optical Fiber Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Traditionally, monitoring insect populations involved the use of externally placed sticky paper traps, which were periodically inspected by a human operator. To automate this process, a specialized sensing device and an accurate model for detecting and counting insect pests are essential. Despite considerable progress in insect pest detector models, their practical application is hindered by the shortage of insect trap images. To attenuate the "lack of data" issue, the literature proposes data augmentation. However, our knowledge about data augmentation is still quite limited, especially in the field of insect pest detection. The aim of this experimental study was to investigate the effect of several widely used augmentation techniques and their combinations on remote-sensed trap images with the YOLOv5 (small) object detector model. This study was carried out systematically on two different datasets starting from the single geometric and photometric transformation toward their combinations. Our results show that the model's mean average precision value (mAP50) could be increased from 0.844 to 0.992 and from 0.421 to 0.727 on the two datasets using the appropriate augmentation methods combination. In addition, this study also points out that the integration of photometric image transformations into the mosaic augmentation can be more efficient than the native combination of augmentation techniques because this approach further improved the model's mAP50 values to 0.999 and 0.756 on the two test sets, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.