Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39065691›Full record

ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Czech Honeydew Honeys-A Potential Source of Local Medical Honey with Strong Antimicrobial Activity.

Ludovit Pudelka, Radek Sleha, Sylva Janovska, Vera Radochova, Pavel Bostik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ludovit PudelkaDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Military General Medicine, Military Faculty of Medicine, University of Defence, 500 01 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Radek SlehaDepartment of Epidemiology, Military Faculty of Medicine, University of Defence, 500 01 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7359-9147
Sylva JanovskaDepartment of Epidemiology, Military Faculty of Medicine, University of Defence, 500 01 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2384-8875
Vera RadochovaAnimal Laboratory, Military Faculty of Medicine, University of Defence, 500 01 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-1477-5451
Pavel BostikDepartment of Epidemiology, Military Faculty of Medicine, University of Defence, 500 01 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2691-6458

Funding

The Ministry of Defence of the Czech Republic DZRO-FVZ22-ZHN IIThe Specific University Research provided by Ministry of Education Youth and Sports SV/FVZ202009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing resistance of microbes to antibiotics, the emergence of multidrug-resistant and extremely resistant strains, and the long time needed to develop new antibiotics are driving the search for additional sources of antibacterial agents. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of Czech honeys with already available pharmaceutical agents containing medicinal honey, and to perform basic biochemical analysis of Czech samples, including detection of undesirable chemical substances. The results showed strong antibacterial activity of Czech honeydew honeys compared to the control group, especially against G+ pathogens, with an average MIC of 9.44% compared to 17.54%, and comparable activity against G- of 16.48% versus 16.66%. In addition to the strong antibacterial activity, this study confirmed the safety and quality of Czech honeys and helped to select the character of a possible source for in vivo testing and subsequent clinical trials.

Indexed as

antibacterial effecthoneydewhydrogen peroxidepolyphenolic compounds

Identifiers

PMID39065691
PMCPMC11279865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.